Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version

2001-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and there under unix (you did not test that, did you?), but I am in the process of fixing them. Ruurd I must confess I didn't test them I have commited everything on the

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version

2001-05-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here >> and there under unix (you did not test that, did you?), but I am in >> the process of fixing them. Ruurd> I must confess I didn't test them I have commited

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version

2001-05-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ruurd done. Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it? JMarc

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version

2001-05-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Ruurd done. | | Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it? No, no problems -- Lgb

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version

2001-05-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ruurd done. OK, while applying the patch, I saw that there are no change logs! Ruurd, could you provide some asap? We need to document all the changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and there under unix (you did not

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version

2001-05-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ruurd> done. Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it? JMarc

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version

2001-05-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Ruurd> done. | | Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it? No, no problems -- Lgb

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version

2001-05-16 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ruurd> done. OK, while applying the patch, I saw that there are no change logs! Ruurd, could you provide some asap? We need to document all the changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and there under unix

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version

2001-05-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ruurd Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in Ruurd the README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116 Ruurd branch. This looks good to me. I'd rather not apply it to 1.1.6, but it is IMO OK for 1.2.0. A few

RE: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version

2001-05-14 Thread Ruurd A. Reitsma
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: maandag 14 mei 2001 14:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: LyX Developers; Claus Hentschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version

2001-05-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ruurd> Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in Ruurd> the README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116 Ruurd> branch. This looks good to me. I'd rather not apply it to 1.1.6, but it is IMO OK for 1.2.0.

RE: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version

2001-05-14 Thread Ruurd A. Reitsma
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: maandag 14 mei 2001 14:43 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: LyX Developers; Claus Hentschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version &g

[PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version

2001-05-12 Thread Ruurd A. Reitsma
Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in the README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116 branch. --Ruurd os_spec2_116.diff.bz2 os_spec2_120.diff.bz2

[PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version

2001-05-12 Thread Ruurd A. Reitsma
Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in the README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116 branch. --Ruurd os_spec2_116.diff.bz2 os_spec2_120.diff.bz2

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support

2001-03-22 Thread Miyata Shigeru
I wrote: Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers to submit the final patch. Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and I can compile LyX again on OS/2. Well, almost. In buffer.C, bitset is included before "LString.h", which

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support

2001-03-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 09:15:01AM +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote: I wrote: Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers to submit the final patch. Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and I can compile LyX again on OS/2. Well,

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support

2001-03-22 Thread Miyata Shigeru
I wrote: > Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers > to submit the final patch. Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and I can compile LyX again on OS/2. Well, almost. In buffer.C, is included before "LString.h", which breaks

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support

2001-03-22 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 09:15:01AM +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote: > I wrote: > > > Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers > > to submit the final patch. > > Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and > I can compile LyX again on

RE: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support

2001-03-21 Thread Ruurd A. Reitsma
Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like that. Yes, but one of the reason was that I

RE: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support

2001-03-21 Thread Ruurd A. Reitsma
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support > > >Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments >> than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like &g

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support

2001-03-20 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | That would be great indeed. | | A few random comments about the patch (I do not know whether they are | addressed to you of to SMiyata...): | | - the private variables should be named binname_, not _binname | | - pay attention to the case of

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support

2001-03-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ruurd after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to Ruurd take a look at the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my Ruurd surprise I found out that Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up Ruurd my patch in a nice os:: class

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support

2001-03-20 Thread Miyata Shigeru
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like that. Yes, but one of the reason was that I cannot test the code on systems other than OS/2. - pay

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support

2001-03-20 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | That would be great indeed. | | A few random comments about the patch (I do not know whether they are | addressed to you of to SMiyata...): | | - the private variables should be named binname_, not _binname | | - pay attention to the case of

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support

2001-03-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ruurd> after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to Ruurd> take a look at the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my Ruurd> surprise I found out that Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up Ruurd> my patch in a nice

Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support

2001-03-20 Thread Miyata Shigeru
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments > than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like > that. Yes, but one of the reason was that I cannot test the code on systems other than OS/2. > -

[PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support

2001-03-13 Thread Ruurd A. Reitsma
after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to take a look at the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my surprise I found out that Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up my patch in a nice os:: class (Thanks!!!). Is there a reason that it hasn't been submitted to CVS as yet???

[PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support

2001-03-13 Thread Ruurd A. Reitsma
after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to take a look at the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my surprise I found out that Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up my patch in a nice os:: class (Thanks!!!). Is there a reason that it hasn't been submitted to CVS as yet???