Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here
and there under unix (you did not test that, did you?), but I am in
the process of fixing them.
Ruurd I must confess I didn't test them
I have commited everything on the
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here
>> and there under unix (you did not test that, did you?), but I am in
>> the process of fixing them.
Ruurd> I must confess I didn't test them
I have commited
Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ruurd done.
Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Ruurd done.
|
| Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it?
No, no problems
--
Lgb
Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ruurd done.
OK, while applying the patch, I saw that there are no change logs!
Ruurd, could you provide some asap? We need to document all the
changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and
there under unix (you did not
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> done.
Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Ruurd> done.
|
| Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it?
No, no problems
--
Lgb
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> done.
OK, while applying the patch, I saw that there are no change logs!
Ruurd, could you provide some asap? We need to document all the
changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and
there under unix
Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ruurd Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in
Ruurd the README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116
Ruurd branch.
This looks good to me. I'd rather not apply it to 1.1.6, but it is IMO
OK for 1.2.0. A few
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: maandag 14 mei 2001 14:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LyX Developers; Claus Hentschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support final version
Ruurd == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in
Ruurd> the README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116
Ruurd> branch.
This looks good to me. I'd rather not apply it to 1.1.6, but it is IMO
OK for 1.2.0.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: maandag 14 mei 2001 14:43
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: LyX Developers; Claus Hentschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version
&g
Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in the
README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116 branch.
--Ruurd
os_spec2_116.diff.bz2
os_spec2_120.diff.bz2
Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in the
README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116 branch.
--Ruurd
os_spec2_116.diff.bz2
os_spec2_120.diff.bz2
I wrote:
Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers
to submit the final patch.
Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and
I can compile LyX again on OS/2. Well, almost.
In buffer.C, bitset is included before "LString.h", which
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 09:15:01AM +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
I wrote:
Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers
to submit the final patch.
Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and
I can compile LyX again on OS/2. Well,
I wrote:
> Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers
> to submit the final patch.
Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and
I can compile LyX again on OS/2. Well, almost.
In buffer.C, is included before "LString.h", which breaks
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 09:15:01AM +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers
> > to submit the final patch.
>
> Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and
> I can compile LyX again on
Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 Win32 support
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments
than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like
that.
Yes, but one of the reason was that I
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support
>
>
>Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments
>> than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like
&g
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| That would be great indeed.
|
| A few random comments about the patch (I do not know whether they are
| addressed to you of to SMiyata...):
|
| - the private variables should be named binname_, not _binname
|
| - pay attention to the case of
"Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ruurd after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to
Ruurd take a look at the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my
Ruurd surprise I found out that Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up
Ruurd my patch in a nice os:: class
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments
than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like
that.
Yes, but one of the reason was that I cannot test the code on systems
other than OS/2.
- pay
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| That would be great indeed.
|
| A few random comments about the patch (I do not know whether they are
| addressed to you of to SMiyata...):
|
| - the private variables should be named binname_, not _binname
|
| - pay attention to the case of
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to
Ruurd> take a look at the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my
Ruurd> surprise I found out that Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up
Ruurd> my patch in a nice
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments
> than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like
> that.
Yes, but one of the reason was that I cannot test the code on systems
other than OS/2.
> -
after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to take a look at
the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my surprise I found out that
Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up my patch in a nice os:: class
(Thanks!!!). Is there a reason that it hasn't been submitted to CVS as
yet???
after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to take a look at
the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my surprise I found out that
Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up my patch in a nice os:: class
(Thanks!!!). Is there a reason that it hasn't been submitted to CVS as
yet???
28 matches
Mail list logo