Re: [PATCH] support --disable-optimization

2001-07-25 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 05:07:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > John> This doesn't change $CFLAGS though, as it's pretty hard to > John> follow where it's set, and it doesn't affect compilation times > John> really > > OK, since

Re: [PATCH] support --disable-optimization

2001-07-24 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:48:10PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > John> But this is a future enhancement IMHO[1]. Is there anything > John> wrong with the patch as it stands ? > > Not wrong, but the approach I advocate would actually mean less > code... what about --with-warnings ? We ju

Re: [PATCH] support --disable-optimization

2001-07-24 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:27:16PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Why not have also a --enable-optimization=-Ox, so that we can remove > the stupid code which does -O2 for stable releases automatically? yes, why not ! But this is a future enhancement IMHO[1]. Is there anything wrong with

[PATCH] support --disable-optimization

2001-07-23 Thread John Levon
This doesn't change $CFLAGS though, as it's pretty hard to follow where it's set, and it doesn't affect compilation times really thanks john -- "Voodoo Programming: Things programmers do that they know shouldn't work but they try anyway, and which sometimes actually work, such as recompiling