Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed?
Thou shalt always listen to your compiler!
I really prefer to use
default in this case because by default it will do the full counter
update.
Have you never been bitten by the problem
What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed? I really prefer to use
default in this case because by default it will do the full counter
update.
We compile with all warnings enabled.
Ignoring them is a kind of federal crime over here.
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed? I really prefer to use
default in this case because by default it will do the full counter
update.
We compile with all warnings enabled.
Ignoring them is a kind of federal crime over here.
Well sheriff there's a lot
Georg Baum a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed?
Thou shalt always listen to your compiler!
I always do, don't worry. I was not talking about me :-)
I really prefer to use
default in this case because by default it
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:19:15PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
...
Thou shalt always listen to your compiler!
_thy_ compiler. :-)
As Angus is retired...
- Martin
pgpus78PqOtZQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am Freitag, 7. April 2006 19:39 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:19:15PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Thou shalt always listen to your compiler!
_thy_ compiler. :-)
I should not pretend to know more than I actually know.
As Angus is retired...
You are a good substitute :-)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Here is the patch. It took me a bit longer than I thought
Abdelrazak because I did not understand the logic in the cursor in
Abdelrazak breakParagraph(). With my former patch one call to
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It is indeed late for 1.4.1, but it will definitely go in 1.4.2.
Abdelrazak> OK, then please note that there are a number of other
Abdelrazak> calls to updateCounters that can be optimized also but I
Abdelrazak> did not have
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It is indeed late for 1.4.1, but it will definitely go in 1.4.2.
Abdelrazak> OK, then please note that there are a number of other
Abdelrazak> calls to updateCounters that can
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed?
Thou shalt always listen to your compiler!
> I really prefer to use
> "default" in this case because by default it will do the full counter
> update.
Have you never been bitten by the
> What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed? I really prefer to use
> "default" in this case because by default it will do the full counter
> update.
We compile with all warnings enabled.
Ignoring them is a kind of federal crime over here.
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed? I really prefer to use
"default" in this case because by default it will do the full counter
update.
We compile with all warnings enabled.
Ignoring them is a kind of federal crime over here.
Well sheriff there's a
Georg Baum a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
What if the compiler warning goes unnoticed?
Thou shalt always listen to your compiler!
I always do, don't worry. I was not talking about me :-)
I really prefer to use
"default" in this case because by default
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:19:15PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
...
> Thou shalt always listen to your compiler!
_thy_ compiler. :-)
As Angus is retired...
- Martin
pgpus78PqOtZQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am Freitag, 7. April 2006 19:39 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
> On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 06:19:15PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> > Thou shalt always listen to your compiler!
>
> _thy_ compiler. :-)
I should not pretend to know more than I actually know.
> As Angus is retired...
You are a good
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Here is the patch. It took me a bit longer than I thought
Abdelrazak> because I did not understand the logic in the cursor in
Abdelrazak> breakParagraph(). With my former patch one call to
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
bool needsUpdateCounters(Buffer const buf, ParIterator it) { if
(it-layout()-counter.empty()) {
Abdelrazak Apparently, this is
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Here is the patch. It took me a bit longer than I thought
Abdelrazak because I did not understand the logic in the cursor in
Abdelrazak breakParagraph(). With my former patch one call to
Abdelrazak needsUpdateCounter on
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Here is the patch. It took me a bit longer than I thought
Abdelrazak because I did not understand the logic in the cursor in
Abdelrazak breakParagraph(). With my former patch one call to
Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
bool needsUpdateCounters(Buffer const & buf, ParIterator & it) { if
(it->layout()->counter.empty()) {
Abdelrazak> Apparently,
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Here is the patch. It took me a bit longer than I thought
Abdelrazak> because I did not understand the logic in the cursor in
Abdelrazak> breakParagraph(). With my former patch one call to
Abdelrazak>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
"Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Here is the patch. It took me a bit longer than I thought
Abdelrazak> because I did not understand the logic in the cursor in
Abdelrazak> breakParagraph(). With my former patch one call to
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
