On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:03 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
OK for trunk? No functionality change.
Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
you don't want to remove the enum and create four functions instead?
Looks to me that you look
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:03 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
OK for trunk? No functionality change.
Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
you don't want to remove the enum and create four functions instead?
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 08:58 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:03 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
OK for trunk? No functionality change.
Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
you
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
Your turn ;-)
Done.
Abdel.
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:03 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer a écrit :
> > OK for trunk? No functionality change.
>
> Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
> you don't want to remove the enum and create four functions instead?
> Looks to me that
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:03 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
OK for trunk? No functionality change.
Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
you don't want to remove the enum and create four functions instead?
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 08:58 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 18:03 +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >> Martin Vermeer a écrit :
> >>> OK for trunk? No functionality change.
> >> Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
Your turn ;-)
Done.
Abdel.
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
OK for trunk? No functionality change.
Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
you don't want to remove the enum and create four functions instead?
Looks to me that you look for the same thing two times.
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Martin Vermeer a écrit :
| OK for trunk? No functionality change.
|
| Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
| you don't want to remove the enum and create four functions instead?
| Looks to me that you look for the
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
OK for trunk? No functionality change.
Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
you don't want to remove the enum and create four functions instead?
Looks to me that you look for the same thing two times.
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Martin Vermeer a écrit :
| > OK for trunk? No functionality change.
|
| Except that it will break Qt4 compilation, no objection. Are you sure
| you don't want to remove the enum and create four functions instead?
| Looks to me that you look for the
12 matches
Mail list logo