Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
the ChangeLog files anymore.
IMHO we should rather put that information in the log message on the
commit.
_if_ we at some point in time feel that we need som kind of
On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Opinions on dropping changelogs?
(If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with
that either.)
I would say that it seems a good idea.
What is the usual procedure in other projects that use svn?
--
Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Opinions on dropping changelogs?
| (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with
| that either.)
|
| I would say that it seems a good idea.
| What is the usual
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:10 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
the ChangeLog files anymore.
IMHO we should rather put that information in the log message on the
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is
Lars using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past.
ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net access.
JMarc
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +, John C. Spray wrote:
One point - it is nice for people downloading tarballs to be able to see
what's changed here and there, so old fashioned Changelogs should still
be generated for released tarballs. Hopefully not to difficult to make
automatic.
I
John C. Spray a écrit :
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:10 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
the ChangeLog files anymore.
IMHO we should rather put that information in the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is
| Lars using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past.
|
| ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net access.
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to
Lars continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.)
Also, the typical changelogs we have are better than our svn commits.
Are we sure we will still have per
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to
| Lars continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.)
|
| Also, the typical changelogs we have are better than
Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
the ChangeLog files anymore.
IMHO we should rather put that information in the log message on the
commit.
_if_ we at some point in time feel that we need som kind of
On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Opinions on dropping changelogs?
> (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with
> that either.)
I would say that it seems a good idea.
What is the usual procedure in other projects that use svn?
> --
>
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Opinions on dropping changelogs?
| > (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with
| > that either.)
|
| I would say that it seems a good idea.
| What is the usual
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:10 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
> indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
> the ChangeLog files anymore.
>
> IMHO we should rather put that information in the log message on the
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is
Lars> using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past.
ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net access.
JMarc
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +, John C. Spray wrote:
> One point - it is nice for people downloading tarballs to be able to see
> what's changed here and there, so old fashioned Changelogs should still
> be generated for released tarballs. Hopefully not to difficult to make
>
John C. Spray a écrit :
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 16:10 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Now, since subverison commits are atomic and have an unique
indentifier (the revision number), I do not really see the need for
the ChangeLog files anymore.
IMHO we should rather put that information in the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is
| Lars> using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past.
|
| ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to
Lars> continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.)
Also, the typical changelogs we have are better than our svn commits.
Are we sure we will still have
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to
| Lars> continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.)
|
| Also, the typical changelogs we have are
20 matches
Mail list logo
