"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Of course, it will not detect uninitialized global variables, but you
| would never use such, would you?
Variables at file scope are always automatically initialized.
(or is this only static variables at file scope?)
Lgb
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Of course, it will not detect uninitialized global variables, but you
| would never use such, would you?
Variables at file scope are always automatically initialized.
(or is this only
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| (or is this only static variables at file scope?)
|
| Lgb
|
|
| Is this a c++ thing ?
No.
Try this:
#include stdio.h
static
int test1;
int test2;
int main()
{
int test3;
printf("test1: %d\n", test1);
printf("test2:
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
No.
That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
embarrass myself C++-wise.
Anyway, my point being, this isn't portable. Not all OS's ensure that the
BSS (or equivalent) is zeroed out on load. So it would be better IMHO not
to
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| No.
|
|
| That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
| embarrass myself C++-wise.
|
| Anyway, my point being, this isn't portable. Not all OS's ensure that the
| BSS (or
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| No.
|
|
| That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
| embarrass myself C++-wise.
|
| Anyway, my point being, this isn't
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Of course, it will not detect uninitialized global variables, but you
| would never use such, would you?
Variables at file scope are always automatically initialized.
(or is this only static variables at file scope?)
Lgb
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Of course, it will not detect uninitialized global variables, but you
> | would never use such, would you?
>
> Variables at file scope are always automatically initialized.
> (or is this
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > (or is this only static variables at file scope?)
| >
| > Lgb
| >
|
| Is this a c++ thing ?
No.
Try this:
#include
static
int test1;
int test2;
int main()
{
int test3;
printf("test1: %d\n", test1);
printf("test2:
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No.
>
That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
embarrass myself C++-wise.
Anyway, my point being, this isn't portable. Not all OS's ensure that the
BSS (or equivalent) is zeroed out on load. So it would be better IMHO not
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > No.
| >
|
| That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
| embarrass myself C++-wise.
|
| Anyway, my point being, this isn't portable. Not all OS's ensure that the
| BSS (or
On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 21 Aug 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > No.
> | >
> |
> | That's what I thought. I asked just to make sure I wasn't going to
> | embarrass myself C++-wise.
> |
> | Anyway, my point being,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
Just got this from the cpptips mailing list of Allan Clarke, this might be
usefull as an ass keeper for all those uninitialized pointers in our code.
What do you say about adding it to the src/support ?
If I remember correctly, you can ask gcc to
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Baruch Even wrote:
> Just got this from the cpptips mailing list of Allan Clarke, this might be
> usefull as an ass keeper for all those uninitialized pointers in our code.
>
> What do you say about adding it to the src/support ?
If I remember correctly, you can ask gcc to
Just got this from the cpptips mailing list of Allan Clarke, this might be
usefull as an ass keeper for all those uninitialized pointers in our code.
What do you say about adding it to the src/support ?
(And about me disappearing for next week, well that will happen sunday).
--
Baruch Even
Just got this from the cpptips mailing list of Allan Clarke, this might be
usefull as an ass keeper for all those uninitialized pointers in our code.
What do you say about adding it to the src/support ?
(And about me disappearing for next week, well that will happen sunday).
--
Baruch Even
16 matches
Mail list logo
