On Thursday 24 May 2007 00:25:46 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> As André gave his OK and me too this can go in right?
Yep. :-)
> regards Uwe
--
José Abílio
> I would like to hear what André has to say about this patch. :-)
As André gave his OK and me too this can go in right?
regards Uwe
It should be included because it is not properly evaluated. LyX
only has a global macro table at the moment. So "calling" a
recursive macro twice will result in strange results.
s/included/excluded/
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Am 23.05.2007 um 01:52 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
First, I like your patch and give an OK.
> FYI, I tried with these examples:
> 5 \newcommand{\foo}[2][\frac{1}{2}]{(#1|#2)} $\foo 1{23}345$
> 6 \newcommand{\foo}[2][\frac{1}{2}]{(#1|#2)} $\foo 1{23}345$
What is the difference?
Nothing :)
Only for i
First, I like your patch and give an OK.
> FYI, I tried with these examples:
> 5 \newcommand{\foo}[2][\frac{1}{2}]{(#1|#2)} $\foo 1{23}345$
> 6 \newcommand{\foo}[2][\frac{1}{2}]{(#1|#2)} $\foo 1{23}345$
What is the difference?
Only for information: Why can't this and 5 and 6 not be imported in
Am 22.05.2007 um 20:39 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 08:49:31AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:08:55 am Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I backported my fix to trunk as proposed by Uwe. The patch is
attached to the bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?
i
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 01:58:42PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> FYI, I tried with these examples:
>
> 1 \newcommand{\foo}{42} $\foo 1{23}345$
> 2 \newcommand{\foo}[1]{(#1)} $\foo 1{23}345$
> 3 \newcommand{\foo}[1]{(#1|#1)} $\foo 1{23}345$
> 4 \newcommand{\foo}[2]{(#1|#2)} $\foo 1{23}345$
> 5
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 08:49:31AM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:08:55 am Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> > I backported my fix to trunk as proposed by Uwe. The patch is
> > attached to the bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21
>
> I would like to hear what Andr
FYI, I tried with these examples:
1 \newcommand{\foo}{42} $\foo 1{23}345$
2 \newcommand{\foo}[1]{(#1)} $\foo 1{23}345$
3 \newcommand{\foo}[1]{(#1|#1)} $\foo 1{23}345$
4 \newcommand{\foo}[2]{(#1|#2)} $\foo 1{23}345$
5 \newcommand{\foo}[2][\frac{1}{2}]{(#1|#2)} $\foo 1{23}345$
6 \newcommand{\foo}[2
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> These should be detected and transformed to ERT.
Stefan> They are. Look at the while loop. It looks for the {
Stefan> character. As long as only proper #n arguments come, the macro
Stefan> is assumed to be compatible (i.e. simple
Am 22.05.2007 um 12:31 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
"Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> I backported my fix to trunk as proposed by Uwe. The patch is
Stefan> attached to the bug report:
Stefan> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21
What do you do with defi
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> I backported my fix to trunk as proposed by Uwe. The patch is
Stefan> attached to the bug report:
Stefan> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21
What do you do with definition more complicated than
\def\foo#1{\bar{#1}}
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:08:55 am Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> I backported my fix to trunk as proposed by Uwe. The patch is
> attached to the bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21
I would like to hear what André has to say about this patch. :-)
> Stefan
--
José Abílio
I'm sure this would be most welcome to people who exchange LyX files
with pure LaTeX users.
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> I backported my fix to trunk as proposed by Uwe. The patch is attached
> to the bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21
>
> Stefan
--
==
I backported my fix to trunk as proposed by Uwe. The patch is
attached to the bug report: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
15 matches
Mail list logo
