Re: [patch] allow breaking lines after updatables

2004-03-02 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Alfredo> Agreed. Still I think that my patch is no good... For > Alfredo> instance, allowing linebreaks on button insets can lead to > Alfredo> undesired effects, like unglueing a sentence period fr

Re: [patch] allow breaking lines after updatables

2004-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alfredo> Agreed. Still I think that my patch is no good... For Alfredo> instance, allowing linebreaks on button insets can lead to Alfredo> undesired effects, like unglueing a sentence period from the Alfredo> word before because of

Re: [patch] allow breaking lines after updatables

2004-02-27 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Alfredo> Mmm... further investigation says that my patch is not > Alfredo> correct, as isLineSeparator is also used for other purposes > Alfredo> besides deciding if a breakpoint is allowed. > > Yes, this is a bit documented in > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cg

Re: [patch] allow breaking lines after updatables

2004-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alfredo> On Friday 27 February 2004 10:37, you wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:31:53AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> > this eliminates some weird rebreaking problems we are having >> [that > probably didn't show in "displ

Re: [patch] allow breaking lines after updatables

2004-02-27 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:06:47AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> On Friday 27 February 2004 10:37, you wrote: >> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:31:53AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> > > this eliminates some weird rebreaking problems we are having [that >> > > proba

Re: [patch] allow breaking lines after updatables

2004-02-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:06:47AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > On Friday 27 February 2004 10:37, you wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:31:53AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > > this eliminates some weird rebreaking problems we are having [that > > > probably didn't show in "displaye

Re: [patch] allow breaking lines after updatables

2004-02-27 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
On Friday 27 February 2004 10:37, you wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 10:31:53AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > > this eliminates some weird rebreaking problems we are having [that > > probably didn't show in "displayed inset" times]. > > > > Ok? > > Yes. > > [Well, maybe we should just change

[patch] allow breaking lines after updatables

2004-02-27 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
this eliminates some weird rebreaking problems we are having [that probably didn't show in "displayed inset" times]. Ok? Alfredo ? insetcollapsable-save.C ? insettext-save.C Index: updatableinset.h === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroo