On Monday 02 July 2007 12:02:32 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> OK then.
+1
> Abdel.
--
José Abílio
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I think it would be less confusing to have one test per controller and
so integrate the kernel().isBufferReadonly() call to
canApplyToReadOnly().
I don't think so. These two conditions might be used independent from each
other.
OK then.
Ab
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I think it would be less confusing to have one test per controller and
> so integrate the kernel().isBufferReadonly() call to
> canApplyToReadOnly().
I don't think so. These two conditions might be used independent from each
other.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3909
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3943
Printing and view-source of read-only files (such as the documentation of an
installed LyX) is disallowed, since we block the passing of params and
viewing restrictively for read
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3909
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3943
Printing and view-source of read-only files (such as the documentation of an
installed LyX) is disallowed, since we block the passing of params and
viewing restrictively for read-only buffers (if kernel().i