Re: [patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-12-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Alfredo Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: | autoopening/closing collapsables. This is really easy with the new scheme | (most of this patch is a replace of status_ - status()) No no no :-) We had that and we removed it... We

Re: [patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-12-01 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: Alfredo Braunstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: | autoopening/closing collapsables. This is really easy with the new | scheme (most of this patch is a replace of status_ - status()) No no no :-)

Re: [patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-12-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: autoopening/closing collapsables. What is the difference to the LFUN ALL_INSETS_TOGGLE, which Angus has implemented? If it would be that insets would be closed again after fr or spellchecking, I'm all

Re: [patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-12-01 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen Alfredo Braunstein wrote: This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: autoopening/closing collapsables. Juergen What is the difference to the LFUN ALL_INSETS_TOGGLE, which

Re: [patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-12-01 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: | autoopening/closing collapsables. This is really easy with the new scheme | (most of this patch is a replace of status_ -> status()) No no no :-) We had that and we removed it...

Re: [patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-12-01 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: > | autoopening/closing collapsables. This is really easy with the new > | scheme (most of this patch is a replace of status_ -> status()) > > No no

Re: [patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-12-01 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: > autoopening/closing collapsables. What is the difference to the LFUN ALL_INSETS_TOGGLE, which Angus has implemented? If it would be that insets would be closed again after f or spellchecking, I'm all

Re: [patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-12-01 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Juergen> Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >>> This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: >>> autoopening/closing collapsables. > > Juergen> What is the difference to the

[patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-11-30 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: autoopening/closing collapsables. This is really easy with the new scheme (most of this patch is a replace of status_ - status()) On a side note, we should keep the following tree bools of insetcollapsable.h inside a metrics cache

[patch] autoclose collapsables

2004-11-30 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
This is quick implementation of a long-standing feature request: autoopening/closing collapsables. This is really easy with the new scheme (most of this patch is a replace of status_ -> status()) On a side note, we should keep the following tree bools of insetcollapsable.h inside a "metrics