Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Please have a look.
I wish you'd get rid of whitespace cruft before asking us to look.,,
Index: po/POTFILES.in
+src/support/path_defines.C
while (true) {
You add it;
I remove it;
}
Could we add a check for whether file.C.in exists before adding
fil
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: src/lyxtext.h
| - InsetOld::RESULT dispatch(FuncRequest const & cmd);
| Does this mean you can remove #include "insets/insetbase.h" from
| lyxtext.h?
I have no idea. Not part of the exercise.
| Index: src/insets/insetbase.h
| +protected:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 02:43:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Please have a look.
Fine with me with exception of the
- virtual dispatch_result localDispatch(FuncRequest const & cmd);
- ///
/// Get the inset parameters, used by the GUIndependent dialog.
Inse
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 02:43:39PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Please have a look.
>
| Fine with me with exception of the
>
| - virtual dispatch_result localDispatch(FuncRequest const & cmd);
| - ///
| /// Get the inset p
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 11:53:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Are there a standard way? If there are a standard way it would be to
> call the public interface "pubdispatch" and the private one
> "dispatch".
Boys, may I ask you not to introduce new programming tenets to LyX
(right now at l
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:00:10AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | with FuncResult being
> >
> | struct FuncResult {
> | dispatch_result res;
> | idx_type idx;
> | pos_type pos;
> | };
>
> Are you sure that no dispatch ever uses the idx and pos pas
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 11:53:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Are there a standard way? If there are a standard way it would be to
>> call the public interface "pubdispatch" and the private one
>> "dispatch".
>
| Boys, may I ask you not to intr
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:00:10AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | with FuncResult being
>> >
>> |struct FuncResult {
>> |dispatch_result res;
>> |idx_type idx;
>> |pos_type pos;
>> |};
>>
>> Are you su
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 11:53:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Are there a standard way? If there are a standard way it would be
>> to call the public interface "pubdispatch" and the private one
>> "dispatch".
>
> Boys, may I ask you not to introduce new programmin
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:21:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | LyX has much more serious problems than not following the latest
> | ideas of the greatest gurus.
>
> Your are off to ranting again. (why is it only your problems that are
> real?)
My real problem is that I probably won't be
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 09:32:18AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Boys, may I ask you not to introduce new programming tenets to LyX
> > (right now at least)?
>
> Speaking for myself, I have been getting LyX's interaction with
> outside files to just work. I have no idea how many 'official' bugs
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:21:43AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | LyX has much more serious problems than not following the latest
>> | ideas of the greatest gurus.
>>
>> Your are off to ranting again. (why is it only your problems that are
>> r
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | And given a choice of implementing Yet Another Feature or
> | fixing Yet Another Bug
... or ranting a bit...
> but you did neither...
>
> | I thought it was more prudent to point to a few
> | issues which hamper LyX devel
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | And given a choice of implementing Yet Another Feature or
>> | fixing Yet Another Bug
>
| ... or ranting a bit...
>
>> but you did neither...
>>
>> | I thought it was more prude
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:41:14AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | And given a choice of implementing Yet Another Feature or
> >> | fixing Yet Another Bug
> >
> | ... o
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Still there are drawing bugs, cursor placement bugs, undo bugs, C&P
>> bugs. I am sure all of them can be fixed, but is it easy?
>
| I am not talking about the core stuff.
I am.
And where do we have all the regressions? Where did they come from?
--
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Still there are drawing bugs, cursor placement bugs, undo bugs,
>>> C&P bugs. I am sure all of them can be fixed, but is it easy?
>>
> | I am not talking about the core stuff.
>
> I am.
>
> And where do we have all the
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Stop this point scoring and fix a bug!
Can't code. Eating.
When finished... I'll try to do one bug at a time, problem is of
course that I do not _really_ grasp the metrics/update stuff. And it
is the update stuff that I'd like to focus on first, curren
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:51:42PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Would be good if someone could go through bugzilla and check all the
> bugs marked with "crash" and see if it is relevant for current CVS.
> All that is relevant and all new crashing bugs should get 1.4.0CVS as
> Target.
I did
19 matches
Mail list logo
