Re: [patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 - 1.4.x

2006-03-17 Thread Georg Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it works go for it. The patch is sensible. Yes. Apply it. Done in trunk. Did you mean 1.4 with the above? Georg

Re: [patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 - 1.4.x

2006-03-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Georg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If it works go for it. The patch is sensible. Yes. Apply it. Georg Done in trunk. Did you mean 1.4 with the above? Yes. JMarc

Re: [patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 -> 1.4.x

2006-03-17 Thread Georg Baum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> If it works go for it. The patch is sensible. > > Yes. Apply it. Done in trunk. Did you mean 1.4 with the above? Georg

Re: [patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 -> 1.4.x

2006-03-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> If it works go for it. The patch is sensible. >> Yes. Apply it. Georg> Done in trunk. Did you mean 1.4 with the above? Yes. JMarc

[patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 - 1.4.x

2006-03-16 Thread Georg Baum
Georg Baum wrote: Attached is a better patch, based on your comments. Plase test. Did anybody test this? It works for me. I think I am committing it to trunk soon, but I'd like to get enough testing so that it can also go into 1.4.1. ChangeLog: * parser_tools.py

Re: [patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 - 1.4.x

2006-03-16 Thread Jose' Matos
On Thursday 16 March 2006 16:57, Georg Baum wrote: Georg Baum wrote: Attached is a better patch, based on your comments. Plase test. Did anybody test this? It works for me. I think I am committing it to trunk soon, but I'd like to get enough testing so that it can also go into 1.4.1.

Re: [patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 - 1.4.x

2006-03-16 Thread lasgouttes
If it works go for it. The patch is sensible. Yes. Apply it. JMarc -- José Abílio

[patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 -> 1.4.x

2006-03-16 Thread Georg Baum
Georg Baum wrote: > Attached is a better patch, based on your comments. > > Plase test. Did anybody test this? It works for me. I think I am committing it to trunk soon, but I'd like to get enough testing so that it can also go into 1.4.1. ChangeLog: * parser_tools.py

Re: [patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 -> 1.4.x

2006-03-16 Thread Jose' Matos
On Thursday 16 March 2006 16:57, Georg Baum wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > > Attached is a better patch, based on your comments. > > > > Plase test. > > Did anybody test this? It works for me. I think I am committing it to trunk > soon, but I'd like to get enough testing so that it can also go into

Re: [patch] fix bug 2245, was: Re: Pending patches for 1.5 -> 1.4.x

2006-03-16 Thread lasgouttes
> If it works go for it. The patch is sensible. Yes. Apply it. JMarc -- José Abílio