OK.
What about my question:
The same is needed for the old revtex.layout but I think we shouldn't take of this file anymore
because the underlying LaTeX package is outdated since 1995 and incompatible to recent babel
versions. Or should I apply the fix nevertheless also to this file?
Btw.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
What about my question:
The same is needed for the old revtex.layout but I think we shouldn't take
of this file anymore because the underlying LaTeX package is outdated since
1995 and incompatible to recent babel versions. Or should I apply the fix
nevertheless also to this
Or should I apply the fix
nevertheless also to this file?
I think it's not needed.
The patch is in.
Btw. as the old revtex package is from 1992 and is incompatible to recent
babel versions, I propose to remove this layout for LyX 2.0. Opinions?
I would leave things as they are.
OK.
> OK.
What about my question:
"The same is needed for the old revtex.layout but I think we shouldn't take of this file anymore
because the underlying LaTeX package is outdated since 1995 and incompatible to recent babel
versions. Or should I apply the fix nevertheless also to this file?"
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> What about my question:
> "The same is needed for the old revtex.layout but I think we shouldn't take
> of this file anymore because the underlying LaTeX package is outdated since
> 1995 and incompatible to recent babel versions. Or should I apply the fix
> nevertheless also to
>> Or should I apply the fix
>> nevertheless also to this file?"
>
> I think it's not needed.
The patch is in.
>> Btw. as the old revtex package is from 1992 and is incompatible to recent
>> babel versions, I propose to remove this layout for LyX 2.0. Opinions?
>
> I would leave things as they
