Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Juergen While doing this, I have also fixed the crash when adding a
Juergen new file format, as described in bug 1692:
Juergen http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1692 The crash was
Juergen cured by adding converters().update() calls
Also sprach Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
This crash was 1.4.0cvs only, right?
yes.
Jürgen
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:30:21PM +, John Levon wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
+ connect(convertersModule-converterToCO, SIGNAL(activated(const
QString)), this, SLOT(converter_changed()));
LyXStyle would be 'QString const '.
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> While doing this, I have also fixed the crash when adding a
Juergen> new file format, as described in bug 1692:
Juergen> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1692 The crash was
Juergen> cured by adding
Also sprach Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> This crash was 1.4.0cvs only, right?
yes.
Jürgen
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:30:21PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > + connect(convertersModule->converterToCO, SIGNAL(activated(const
> > QString&)), this, SLOT(converter_changed()));
> >
> > LyXStyle would be 'QString
The attached patch tries to clear the confusion people have when trying to add
a new converter with the qt frontend. Cf.
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1488
The ui was just horrible. I think the xforms ui is much more intuitive in this
case. I adapted it for the qt frontend.
(the
Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| The attached patch tries to clear the confusion people have when trying to
add
| a new converter with the qt frontend. Cf.
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1488
| The ui was just horrible. I think the xforms ui is much more intuitive in
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:00:43PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
OK to apply?
Can't comment much on th ui as I haven't tried it out.
However, I have some style comments/questions.
@@ -173,6 +174,10 @@ QPrefsDialog::QPrefsDialog(QPrefs * form
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
+ connect(convertersModule-converterToCO, SIGNAL(activated(const
QString)), this, SLOT(converter_changed()));
LyXStyle would be 'QString const '.
I know that early MOC had a problem with that, but as 3.3.3's moc
Also sprach Andre Poenitz:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:00:43PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
OK to apply?
Can't comment much on th ui as I haven't tried it out.
However, I have some style comments/questions.
@@ -173,6 +174,10 @@ QPrefsDialog::QPrefsDialog(QPrefs * form
John Levon wrote:
See 1488 comment 1. Anyway, I don't think *either* interfaces are any
good as it happens. But since you fixed a crash, we can use your patch I
suppose.
Are you sure that it really created an empty converter? That means, we had an
empty item in the comboxes. That'd be no more
The attached patch tries to clear the confusion people have when trying to add
a new converter with the qt frontend. Cf.
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1488
The ui was just horrible. I think the xforms ui is much more intuitive in this
case. I adapted it for the qt frontend.
(the
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The attached patch tries to clear the confusion people have when trying to
add
| a new converter with the qt frontend. Cf.
| http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1488
| The ui was just horrible. I think the xforms ui is much more intuitive
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:00:43PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> OK to apply?
Can't comment much on th ui as I haven't tried it out.
However, I have some style comments/questions.
@@ -173,6 +174,10 @@ QPrefsDialog::QPrefsDialog(QPrefs * form
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 09:32:50PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> + connect(convertersModule->converterToCO, SIGNAL(activated(const
> QString&)), this, SLOT(converter_changed()));
>
> LyXStyle would be 'QString const &'.
>
> I know that early MOC had a problem with that, but as
Also sprach Andre Poenitz:
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 08:00:43PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > OK to apply?
>
> Can't comment much on th ui as I haven't tried it out.
>
> However, I have some style comments/questions.
>
> @@ -173,6 +174,10 @@ QPrefsDialog::QPrefsDialog(QPrefs * form
John Levon wrote:
> See 1488 comment 1. Anyway, I don't think *either* interfaces are any
> good as it happens. But since you fixed a crash, we can use your patch I
> suppose.
Are you sure that it really created an empty converter? That means, we had an
"empty" item in the comboxes. That'd be no
18 matches
Mail list logo
