Citeren Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:18:45AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable()
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
renamed)
Martin ...to hasText()?
Or isDescendable().
JMarc
Am 13.06.2007 um 14:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
renamed)
Martin ...to hasText()?
Or isDescendable().
+1
hasText() sounds like !cell(i).empty()
Stefan
PGP.sig
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:09:39PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 13.06.2007 um 14:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
renamed)
Martin ...to hasText()?
Or
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:02:48PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
renamed)
Martin ...to hasText()?
Or isDescendable().
Better.
Andre'
Citeren Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:18:45AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > BTW I find isActive() not very clear.
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
>> renamed)
>>
Martin> ...to hasText()?
Or isDescendable().
JMarc
Am 13.06.2007 um 14:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
"Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
renamed)
Martin> ...to hasText()?
Or isDescendable().
+1
hasText() sounds like !cell(i).empty()
Stefan
PGP.sig
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:09:39PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>
> Am 13.06.2007 um 14:02 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> >> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>> And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
> >>> renamed)
> >>>
> >
> >
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:02:48PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> And one of them is 'isActive()' (which probably {c,sh}ould be
> >> renamed)
> >>
>
> Martin> ...to hasText()?
>
> Or isDescendable().
Better.
Andre'
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
None that I am aware of.
One of the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:18:45AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
Is there the equivalent
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
> > Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
>
> None that I am aware of.
>
> One
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:18:45AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 11:45:34PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
> > > Is there the
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:37:31AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
Stefan wants to know more:
I can't tell you. It is conceptionally sound, however, so close to
1.5.0
it might be more prudent to use something like
The old behavior is simpler than I thought. A search for isActive
basically shows that there is no math inset (other than the
InsetMathMBox, which just return true, and
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
mathinset must have an isActive method and 2) it should return true
only if the inset has really accessible cells?
Andre It's even in InsetBase, and something like that was the
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:56:45AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I can't tell you. It is conceptionally sound, however, so close to
1.5.0
it might be more prudent to use something like
The old behavior is simpler than I thought. A search for isActive
basically shows that there is no
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:47:13AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
mathinset must have an isActive method and 2) it should return true
only if the inset has really accessible
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:06:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:47:13AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
mathinset must have an isActive method
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would
Martin be clearer. Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
A ref inset?
JMarc
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
None that I am aware of.
One of the problems I have with {IS,HIGHLY}_EDITABLE is that it is
a single flag
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 09:37:31AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
> > Stefan>
I can't tell you. It is conceptionally sound, however, so close to
1.5.0
it might be more prudent to use something like
The old behavior is simpler than I thought. A search for isActive
basically shows that there is no math inset (other than the
InsetMathMBox, which just return true, and
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
>> mathinset must have an isActive method and 2) it should return true
>> only if the inset has really accessible cells?
Andre> It's even in InsetBase, and something like
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:56:45AM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >I can't tell you. It is conceptionally sound, however, so close to
> >1.5.0
> >it might be more prudent to use something like
>
> The old behavior is simpler than I thought. A search for isActive
> basically shows that
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:47:13AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
> >> mathinset must have an isActive method and 2) it should return true
> >> only if the inset
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 08:06:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:47:13AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> Do I understand correctly that this presupposes that 1) every
> > >> mathinset must have
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would
Martin> be clearer. Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
A ref inset?
JMarc
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 09:46:27PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> BTW I find isActive() not very clear. isHighlyEditable() would be clearer.
> Is there the equivalent of IS_EDITABLE in math?
None that I am aware of.
One of the problems I have with {IS,HIGHLY}_EDITABLE is that it is
a single flag
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:03:55PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance.
If anybody wants to know more:
1) CommandInset (used e.g. for references in mathed) has two cells to
hold information about where it points to. But it only draws a
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:03:55PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance.
>
> If anybody wants to know more:
>
> 1) CommandInset (used e.g. for references in mathed) has two cells to
> hold information about where it points to. But it only draws a
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
Stefan wants to know more:
[snip]
Great analysis!
I would say that the fix is correct,
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
Stefan wants to know more:
[snip]
Great analysis!
I would
Am 09.06.2007 um 08:37 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If
anybody
Stefan wants to know more:
[snip]
Great
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
> Stefan> wants to know more:
>
> [snip]
>
> Great analysis!
>
> I would say that
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
Stefan> wants to know more:
[snip]
Great analysis!
I
Am 09.06.2007 um 08:37 schrieb Martin Vermeer:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:22:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If
anybody
Stefan> wants to know more:
[snip]
Great
Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance.
If anybody wants to know more:
1) CommandInset (used e.g. for references in mathed) has two cells to
hold information about where it points to. But it only draws a
button, not the cells themselves. So accessing the cells' coordinates
in
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
Stefan wants to know more:
[snip]
Great analysis!
I would say that the fix is correct, but I'd wait for Andre's input.
JMarc
Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance.
If anybody wants to know more:
1) CommandInset (used e.g. for references in mathed) has two cells to
hold information about where it points to. But it only draws a
button, not the cells themselves. So accessing the cells' coordinates
in
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Critical bugs don't get less critical by ignorance. If anybody
Stefan> wants to know more:
[snip]
Great analysis!
I would say that the fix is correct, but I'd wait for Andre's input.
JMarc
Am 04.06.2007 um 23:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
Stefan segfault and nobody has a comment?
Actually I am wondering why suddenly we have these crashes in very
simple
Am 04.06.2007 um 23:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
"Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
Stefan> segfault and nobody has a comment?
Actually I am wondering why suddenly we have these crashes in very
Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
segfault and nobody has a comment?
Stefan
Any consensus about this one? It still crashes in RC1.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Stefan == Stefan Schimanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stefan Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
Stefan segfault and nobody has a comment?
Actually I am wondering why suddenly we have these crashes in very
simple operations (like breakParagraph this one). Isn't there
Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
segfault and nobody has a comment?
Stefan
Any consensus about this one? It still crashes in RC1.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
> "Stefan" == Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> Hmm, it's a not very complex patch for a critical bug about a
Stefan> segfault and nobody has a comment?
Actually I am wondering why suddenly we have these crashes in very
simple operations (like breakParagraph this one).
Any consensus about this one? It still crashes in RC1.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Any consensus about this one? It still crashes in RC1.
Stefan
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the
coord cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that
this is related (and also fixes) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?
id=3715 .
I believe the problem is when an inset derived from InsetMathNest
does
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the coord
cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
related (and also fixes) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3715 .
I believe the problem is when an inset derived
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:56:35PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the coord
cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
related (and also fixes)
Am 30.05.2007 um 20:32 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:56:35PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the
coord
cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the
coord cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that
this is related (and also fixes) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?
id=3715 .
I believe the problem is when an inset derived from InsetMathNest
does
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the coord
cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
related (and also fixes) http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3715 .
I believe the problem is when an inset derived
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:56:35PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the coord
> >cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
> >related (and also fixes)
Am 30.05.2007 um 20:32 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:56:35PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
Here is a patch for a crash that happens due to a cell not in the
coord
cache during the drawing of the selection. It could be that this is
58 matches
Mail list logo
