Re: [patch] general cleanup

Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:38:39AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> > I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which >> > is least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all. >> >> You mean you can give abuse but can't hand

Re: [patch] general cleanup

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > m=me > Y should know m better than that. Oh I do. I'm just avoiding thinking about an A=abstract I should be writing. -- Angus

Re: [patch] general cleanup

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:32:42PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > At least I send my patches to the list. > > Don't you ever read your own postings? No, why should I tread myself differently? > I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees I just imagine trees covered with patches *grin* Isn'

Re: [patch] general cleanup

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 11:38:39AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which is > > least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all. > > You mean you can give abuse but can't handle it when you're being > a

Re: [patch] general cleanup

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which is >> least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all. > | You mean you can give abuse but can't handle it when you're being | abused? > | Sorry. I mea

Re: [patch] general cleanup

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > >> Lots of small stuff. > > > | very. > > > >> Should be uncontroversial. > > > | completely. > > concur... but the cleanup is infinitesimal

Re: [patch] general cleanup

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I have my patches spread over 3-4 trees and I am wondering which is > least controversial and if I'll dare to post it at all. You mean you can give abuse but can't handle it when you're being abused? Sorry. I meant Y=you find it hard to accept the conclusions of the

Re: [patch] general cleanup

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | Andre Poenitz wrote: >> > >> >> Lots of small stuff. >> > >> | very. >> > >> >> Should be uncontroversial. >> > >> | completel

Re: [patch] general cleanup

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > >> Lots of small stuff. > > > | very. > > > >> Should be uncontroversial. > > > | completely. > > concur... but the cleanup is infinitesimal 40 l

Re: [patch] general cleanup

Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Andre Poenitz wrote: > > >> Lots of small stuff. > | very. > >> Should be uncontroversial. > | completely. concur... but the cleanup is infinitesimal -- Lgb

Re: [patch] general cleanup

Andre Poenitz wrote: > Lots of small stuff. very. > Should be uncontroversial. completely. Alfredo

[patch] general cleanup

Lots of small stuff. Should be uncontroversial. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)