Re: 1.2.0 - 1.3.0 include pulldown

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:40:10PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the text as verbatim, even though in 122, the doc was saved with the included text as included. Thanks, fixed in my tree. wanting a rock to wind a piece of string

Re: 1.2.0 - 1.3.0 include pulldown

John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | wanting a rock to wind a piece of string around, That is a reference I do not get... -- Lgb

Re: 1.2.0 -> 1.3.0 "include" pulldown

On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:40:10PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the > text as "verbatim", even though in 122, the doc was saved with the > included text as "included". Thanks, fixed in my tree. wanting a rock to wind a piece of

Re: 1.2.0 -> 1.3.0 "include" pulldown

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | wanting a rock to wind a piece of string around, That is a reference I do not get... -- Lgb

1.2.0 - 1.3.0 include pulldown

In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the text as verbatim, even though in 122, the doc was saved with the included text as included. It seems to format OK for latex though. Rod _ rod | Beneath the

1.2.0 -> 1.3.0 "include" pulldown

In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the text as "verbatim", even though in 122, the doc was saved with the included text as "included". It seems to format OK for latex though. Rod _ rod | "Beneath

Re: lynx 1.2.0 crash on Red Hat Linux 7.3

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:52:15AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: lyx: SIGSEGV signal caught Sorry, you have found a bug in LyX. Please read the bug-reporting instructions in Help-Introduction and send us a bug report, if necessary. Thanks ! Bye. Aborted It would be helpful to get the

Re: lynx 1.2.0 crash on Red Hat Linux 7.3

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:52:15AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > lyx: SIGSEGV signal caught > Sorry, you have found a bug in LyX. Please read the bug-reporting instructions > in Help->Introduction and send us a bug report, if necessary. Thanks ! > Bye. > Aborted It would be helpful to get

lynx 1.2.0 crash on Red Hat Linux 7.3

I don't have web access ATM. Here's the version: [summer@numbat summer]$ rpm -qif /usr/bin/lyx Name: lyx Relocations: /usr Version : 1.2.0 Vendor: (none) Release : 1 Build Date: Sat 17 Aug 2002 05:30

lynx 1.2.0 crash on Red Hat Linux 7.3

I don't have web access ATM. Here's the version: [summer@numbat summer]$ rpm -qif /usr/bin/lyx Name: lyx Relocations: /usr Version : 1.2.0 Vendor: (none) Release : 1 Build Date: Sat 17 Aug 2002 05:30

Re: CRASH 1.2.0 1.2.2cvs

Garst R. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Upgrading A's box to xforms-1.0RC4 cured the problem. Ok, then I'll consider this case closed. -- Lgb

Re: CRASH 1.2.0 & 1.2.2cvs

"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Upgrading A's box to xforms-1.0RC4 cured the problem. Ok, then I'll consider this case closed. -- Lgb

Re: CRASH 1.2.0 1.2.2cvs

A. A. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | This is a reproducable crash that Alice found. The file has a number of | minipages, some with graphics. It is a newsletter using multicol. Open | it up, use PgDn key to end of file, then PgUp until it crashes. Below is | a partial listing of lyx -dbg key.

Re: CRASH 1.2.0 & 1.2.2cvs

"A. A. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This is a reproducable crash that Alice found. The file has a number of | minipages, some with graphics. It is a newsletter using multicol. Open | it up, use PgDn key to end of file, then PgUp until it crashes. Below is | a partial listing of lyx -dbg

CRASH 1.2.0 1.2.2cvs

This is a reproducable crash that Alice found. The file has a number of minipages, some with graphics. It is a newsletter using multicol. Open it up, use PgDn key to end of file, then PgUp until it crashes. Below is a partial listing of lyx -dbg key. Please don't cc this address, I'll get the

CRASH 1.2.0 & 1.2.2cvs

This is a reproducable crash that Alice found. The file has a number of minipages, some with graphics. It is a newsletter using multicol. Open it up, use PgDn key to end of file, then PgUp until it crashes. Below is a partial listing of lyx -dbg key. Please don't cc this address, I'll get the

LyX 1.2.0 on HP-UX 11i with GCC 3.1.1 or 3.2

Anyone build LyX 1.2.x successfully on HP-UX 11i with GCC 3.1.1 or 3.2? With 3.2, I get errors like: typeinfo name for MathStackrelInset(first referenced in mathed/.libs/libmathed.a(formulabase.o)) (data) ControlInsetInsetGraphics, InsetGraphicsParams::updateSlot(bool) (first referenced in

LyX 1.2.0 on HP-UX 11i with GCC 3.1.1 or 3.2

Anyone build LyX 1.2.x successfully on HP-UX 11i with GCC 3.1.1 or 3.2? With 3.2, I get errors like: typeinfo name for MathStackrelInset(first referenced in mathed/.libs/libmathed.a(formulabase.o)) (data) ControlInset::updateSlot(bool) (first referenced

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: If there is something you really want in 1.2.1, send a (well tested) patch. Juergen I've just discovered that you cleaned up the bindings for Juergen starred sectioning commands. Well, I want that

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> If there is something you really want in 1.2.1, send a (well >> tested) patch. Juergen> I've just discovered that you cleaned up the bindings for Juergen> starred sectioning commands.

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

Herbert == Herbert Voss [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Herbert Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: If somebody does it for me, I will consider to apply the patch. I do not have much time to do it myself. Anyway, I already would like to release 1.2.1 pretty soon, so some features have to be postponed. If

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: If there is something you really want in 1.2.1, send a (well tested) patch. I've just discovered that you cleaned up the bindings for starred sectioning commands. Well, I want that for german too ;-) Here's a patch (against 1.2.1cvs). It's not really important, but

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I've just discovered that you cleaned up the bindings for starred sectioning commands. Well, I want that for german too ;-) I wonder who's got the idea of localized key bindings. That's crazy to use if you often switch

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: I've just discovered that you cleaned up the bindings for starred sectioning commands. Well, I want that for german too ;-) | I wonder who's got the idea of localized key bindings.

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:30:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: I wonder who's got the idea of localized key bindings. That's crazy to use if you often switch languanges. IMO formating paragraphs it should be M-p for German too, even if 'Absatz' does not has a 'p' You're on thin ice here.

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 05:38:28PM +0100, John Levon wrote: You're on thin ice here. Being pathetically mono-lingual I often imagine if Atari hadn't screwed themselves and somehow most software was primarily German. I can tell you one thing: M-b for Paragraph would infuriate me, and it would

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:49:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Reminds me of some (English) guy who didn't like foreign movies (even those translated to English) because he was (unconciously) used to reading lips. There's nothing worse than dubbed films anyway. Subtitles ! Believe me, you

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:49:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Reminds me of some (English) guy who didn't like foreign movies (even those translated to English) because he was (unconciously) used to reading lips. | There's nothing worse than dubbed

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

Andre Poenitz wrote: I wonder who's got the idea of localized key bindings. That's crazy to use if you often switch languanges. IMO formating paragraphs it should be M-p for German too, even if 'Absatz' does not has a 'p' I don't care, as long as they are memorizable and not too

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Herbert> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> If somebody does it for me, I will consider to apply the patch. I >> do not have much time to do it myself. Anyway, I already would like >> to release 1.2.1 pretty soon, so some features have to

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > If there is something you really want in 1.2.1, send a (well tested) > patch. I've just discovered that you cleaned up the bindings for starred sectioning commands. Well, I want that for german too ;-) Here's a patch (against 1.2.1cvs). It's not really important,

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > I've just discovered that you cleaned up the bindings for starred sectioning > commands. Well, I want that for german too ;-) I wonder who's got the idea of localized key bindings. That's crazy to use if you often switch

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> I've just discovered that you cleaned up the bindings for starred sectioning >> commands. Well, I want that for german too ;-) > | I wonder who's got the idea of localized key

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:30:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > I wonder who's got the idea of localized key bindings. That's crazy to use > if you often switch languanges. IMO formating paragraphs it should be M-p > for German too, even if 'Absatz' does not has a 'p' You're on thin ice

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 05:38:28PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > You're on thin ice here. Being pathetically mono-lingual I often imagine > if Atari hadn't screwed themselves and somehow most software was > primarily German. I can tell you one thing: M-b for "Paragraph" would > infuriate me, and it

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:49:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Reminds me of some (English) guy who didn't like foreign movies (even those > translated to English) because he was (unconciously) used to reading lips. There's nothing worse than dubbed films anyway. Subtitles ! > Believe me,

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:49:03PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > >> Reminds me of some (English) guy who didn't like foreign movies (even those >> translated to English) because he was (unconciously) used to reading lips. > | There's nothing worse than

Re: Possible BUG in LyX 1.2.0 (ERT inset related)

Andre Poenitz wrote: > I wonder who's got the idea of localized key bindings. That's crazy to use > if you often switch languanges. IMO formating paragraphs it should be M-p > for German too, even if 'Absatz' does not has a 'p' I don't care, as long as they are memorizable and not too

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:42:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: For the manual fontchanges we automatically create a unnamed CharacterStyle for it. (some magic internal name) | I'd rather not allow such manual

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Dekel == Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 4) Bookmarks do not work inside an inset. What is a bookmark? Dekel It allows you to save a position in the document and return to Dekel it later. Note that this is a bug entered in bugzilla (bug 384). Could you have a quick look at it? It is

Re: 1.2.0 link problem on RedHat 7.3

fdesign it couldn't find the X libraries. I patched the Peter fdesign/Makefile with a -L/usr/X11R6/lib and then it worked Peter fine. Peter I untarred the lyx-1.2.0 source again and ran configure ala`: Sorry, xforms 1.0 is not supported by lyx 1.2.0. It should work when 1.2.1 is released. JMarc

Re: patches: make lyx 1.2.0 work for Turkish again

Mike == Mike Fabian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mike But this patch is really only a hack and certainly should not Mike applied like that to the upstream version of LyX. I only Mike attached it to show what the problem is. There must be a better Mike solution. Yes, but I really do not know which

Re: Making personal lyx.mo files with 1.2.0

Philipp == Philipp Sasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Philipp Hello, (sorry I didn't find where this is documented ...) It is not. Philipp I'm used to applying lots of changes to my po/xx.po file Philipp before building lyx. But as with 1.2.0 the changes are Philipp ignored. It seems, the xx.gmo

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:42:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > >> For the manual fontchanges we automatically create a unnamed > >> CharacterStyle for it. (some magic internal name) > > > | I'd rather not

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > 4) Bookmarks do not work inside an inset. >> >> What is a bookmark? Dekel> It allows you to save a position in the document and return to Dekel> it later. Note that this is a bug entered in bugzilla (bug 384). Could you have a quick

Re: 1.2.0 link problem on RedHat 7.3

> Mostly this went well except when the make tried to link Peter> fdesign it couldn't find the X libraries. I patched the Peter> fdesign/Makefile with a "-L/usr/X11R6/lib" and then it worked Peter> fine. Peter> I untarred the lyx-1.2.0 source again and ran configure ala`:

Re: patches: make lyx 1.2.0 work for Turkish again

> "Mike" == Mike Fabian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> But this patch is really only a hack and certainly should not Mike> applied like that to the upstream version of LyX. I only Mike> attached it to show what the problem is. There must be a better Mike> solution. Yes, but I really do

Re: Making personal lyx.mo files with 1.2.0

>>>>> "Philipp" == Philipp Sasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Philipp> Hello, (sorry I didn't find where this is documented ...) It is not. Philipp> I'm used to applying lots of changes to my po/xx.po file Philipp> before building lyx. But as wit

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 08:15:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:35:30AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: But using insets have other problems. The most important one is that an inset cannot be broken across lines (e.g. +--- foo foo foo |bar bar ---+

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:52:09PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: The cleanest way is perhaps with insets, but this will require a much improved handling of insets: For example, allowing an inset to break over two lines. It will be a long time before we can have this, if at all. Could people

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:59:30AM +0100, John Levon wrote: | A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in | exclusive) insets. | | what about space and accent insets ? a space could be regarded as a regular character... an accent inset would be regarded as a

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:23:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I think we should first of all have a discussion on how to implement character styles as cleanly as possible. Discussion opened? Ok: Character styles should be done by using something similar to MathFontInsets.

Re: Lyx 1.2.0 on Mac OS X, the Final Frontier

John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John I'm not sure if it's still valid though. And in fact, I'm John surprised that fixincludes in gcc doesn't fix this problem. It John may be old cruft. fixincludes does not touch the x11 headers, AFAIK. And I would think that things like solaris

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Ok: Character styles should be done by using something similar to MathFontInsets. Regular font (i.e. commands like \textbf) should be implemented like character styles, so this means removing the font list from the paragraph

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:18:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: Ok: Character styles should be done by using something similar to MathFontInsets. Regular font (i.e. commands like \textbf) should be implemented like character styles, so this means removing the font list from the paragraph

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:40:56PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: Other disadvantages: 1) Current inset code doesn't allow inheritance of font settings from the current paragraph or from parent inset. For example, if I have a paragraph which set the font to italics (e.g. a Theorem

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:46:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | p.s. fwiw I agree it is worth waiting a bit longer to do this right. We | have too many craply-implemented features in lyx and we suffer for | it right. The main problem with badly implemented features, like

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 07:11:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: It allows you to save a position in the document and return to it later. No big deal I'd say. Something like an invisible label that does not get saved... I am not talking about _insets_, I am talking about taking math font insets

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:42:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: For the manual fontchanges we automatically create a unnamed CharacterStyle for it. (some magic internal name) I'd rather not allow such manual changes. A user must create a new name if they want bold italic text, even if

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:42:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: For the manual fontchanges we automatically create a unnamed CharacterStyle for it. (some magic internal name) | I'd rather not allow such manual changes. A user must create a new name

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 08:15:04PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:35:30AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > But using insets have other problems. > The most important one is that an inset cannot be broken across lines > (e.g. > +--- > foo foo foo |bar bar > ---+

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:52:09PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > The cleanest way is perhaps with insets, but this will require a much > improved handling of insets: For example, allowing an inset to break over > two lines. It will be a long time before we can have this, if at all. Could people

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:59:30AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > | > A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in > > | > exclusive) insets. > > | > > | what about space and accent insets ? > > > > a space could be regarded as a regular character... an accent inset > > would be

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:23:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I think we should first of all have a discussion on how to implement > character styles as cleanly as possible. Discussion opened? Ok: Character styles should be done by using something similar to MathFontInsets.

Re: Lyx 1.2.0 on Mac OS X, the Final Frontier

> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> I'm not sure if it's still valid though. And in fact, I'm John> surprised that fixincludes in gcc doesn't fix this problem. It John> may be old cruft. fixincludes does not touch the x11 headers, AFAIK. And I would think that things

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Ok: Character styles should be done by using something similar to > MathFontInsets. Regular font (i.e. commands like \textbf) should be implemented like character styles, so this means removing the font list from the paragraph

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:18:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > Ok: Character styles should be done by using something similar to > > MathFontInsets. > > Regular font (i.e. commands like \textbf) should be implemented like character > styles, so this means removing the font list from the

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:40:56PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Other disadvantages: > > > > 1) Current inset code doesn't allow inheritance of font settings from the > > current paragraph or from parent inset. > > For example, if I have a paragraph which set the font to italics > > (e.g. a

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:46:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > | p.s. fwiw I agree it is worth waiting a bit longer to do this right. We > | have too many craply-implemented features in lyx and we suffer for > | it > > right. The main problem with badly implemented features, like

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 07:11:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > It allows you to save a position in the document and return to it later. No big deal I'd say. Something like an invisible label that does not get saved... > > I am not talking about _insets_, I am talking about "taking math font > >

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:42:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > For the manual fontchanges we automatically create a unnamed > CharacterStyle for it. (some magic internal name) I'd rather not allow such manual changes. A user must create a new name if they want bold italic text, even if

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 05:42:19PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> For the manual fontchanges we automatically create a unnamed >> CharacterStyle for it. (some magic internal name) > | I'd rather not allow such manual changes. A user must create a

Re: Lyx 1.2.0 on Mac OS X, the Final Frontier

Is -no-cpp-precomp really necessary ? Why ? For this particular option, I have confirmed that the Fink project also found it necessary to use this. In their 1.2.0 configuration, this option is selected as well. Given that they are now providing 1.2.0 in their current/unstable setup, perhaps

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:34:21AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 10:53:36PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: I think it is easy to implement them on top of current math text (without the user being able to tell that he's in math) But I would not do the UI part, jsut the

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:35:30AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:24:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: Actually, it think it possible to implement character styles by just few modifications to lyxfont.C (and no changes to the data structures). These might not allow

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | Actually, it think it possible to implement character styles by just | few modifications to lyxfont.C (and no changes to the data structures). | These might not allow nesting of styles, but this can wait for a better |

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | | | Actually, it think it possible to implement character styles by just | | few modifications to lyxfont.C (and no changes to the data structures). | | These might not allow

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:42:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | The font structs are already too big. | | We are already implementing Character Styles in lyxfont.C (emph, | noun). And neither om them should be in lyxfont. So where do you want

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:42:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | The font structs are already too big. | | | | We are already implementing Character Styles in lyxfont.C (emph, | | noun). | | And

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:23:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Anyway, if I create a patch for character styles using lyxfont which | doesn't make it more complex than it is now, would you accept it? I certanly would like not too... When the goal is to simplifying lyxfont (among

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Dekel Tsur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:23:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | Anyway, if I create a patch for character styles using lyxfont which | | doesn't make it more complex than it is now, would you accept it? | | I certanly would like not too... |

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in exclusive) insets. what about space and accent insets ? regards john p.s. fwiw I agree it is worth waiting a bit longer to do this right. We have too many

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in | exclusive) insets. | | what about space and accent insets ? a space could be regarded as a regular character... an

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:46:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in | exclusive) insets. | | what about space and accent insets ? a space could be regarded as a regular character... an accent inset would be regarded as a

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:46:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | | A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in | | exclusive) insets. | | | | what about space and accent insets ? | | a space could be regarded as a

Re: Lyx 1.2.0 on Mac OS X, the Final Frontier

> Is -no-cpp-precomp really necessary ? Why ? For this particular option, I have confirmed that the Fink project also found it necessary to use this. In their 1.2.0 configuration, this option is selected as well. Given that they are now providing 1.2.0 in their current/unstable setup, perh

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:34:21AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 10:53:36PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > I think it is easy to implement them on top of current math text (without > > > the user being able to tell that he's in "math") But I would not do the > > > UI part,

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:35:30AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:24:55PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > Actually, it think it possible to implement character styles by just > > few modifications to lyxfont.C (and no changes to the data structures). > > These might not

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > | Actually, it think it possible to implement character styles by just > | few modifications to lyxfont.C (and no changes to the data structures). > | These might not allow nesting of styles, but this can wait for a

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | | > | Actually, it think it possible to implement character styles by just | > | few modifications to lyxfont.C (and no changes to the data structures). | > | These might not

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:42:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > The font structs are already too big. > | > | We are already implementing Character Styles in lyxfont.C (emph, > | noun). > > And neither om them should be in lyxfont. So where

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:42:03PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > The font structs are already too big. | > | | > | We are already implementing Character Styles in lyxfont.C (emph, | > | noun). | > |

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:23:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Anyway, if I create a patch for character styles using lyxfont which > | doesn't make it more complex than it is now, would you accept it? > > I certanly would like not too... > > When the goal is to simplifying lyxfont

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 10:23:09PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | Anyway, if I create a patch for character styles using lyxfont which | > | doesn't make it more complex than it is now, would you accept it? | > | > I certanly would like not

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in > exclusive) insets. what about space and accent insets ? regards john p.s. fwiw I agree it is worth waiting a bit longer to do this right. We have too many

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in | > exclusive) insets. | | what about space and accent insets ? a space could be regarded as a regular character...

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:46:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in > | > exclusive) insets. > | > | what about space and accent insets ? > > a space could be regarded as a regular character... an accent inset > would be

Re: Does LyX 1.2.0 support character styles?

John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:46:06AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > | > A SimpleInset would only contain plain characters _or_ (as in | > | > exclusive) insets. | > | | > | what about space and accent insets ? | > | > a space could be regarded

Lyx 1.2.0 on Mac OS X, the Final Frontier

Hi! I am happy to report that I have identified and documented the issues to get Lyx 1.2.0 built on Mac OS X. I realize that the Fink project will get it working as well; however, I have some doubts that they are communicating all the issues to the Lyx team to ensure that future releases build

Re: Lyx 1.2.0 on Mac OS X, the Final Frontier

On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 04:01:06PM -0500, George K. Thiruvathukal wrote: 1.1.6, which had the same build problems). I hope that my feedback will be helpful to you and that you can modify your configure.in (where most all of the problems are) so there can one day be a clean build on OS X. It

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >