Re: 1.2.0 - 1.3.0 include pulldown

2002-11-07 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:40:10PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the text as verbatim, even though in 122, the doc was saved with the included text as included. Thanks, fixed in my tree. wanting a rock to wind a piece of string

Re: 1.2.0 - 1.3.0 include pulldown

2002-11-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | wanting a rock to wind a piece of string around, That is a reference I do not get... -- Lgb

Re: 1.2.0 -> 1.3.0 "include" pulldown

2002-11-07 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:40:10PM +0800, Rod Pinna wrote: > In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the > text as "verbatim", even though in 122, the doc was saved with the > included text as "included". Thanks, fixed in my tree. wanting a rock to wind a piece of

Re: 1.2.0 -> 1.3.0 "include" pulldown

2002-11-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | wanting a rock to wind a piece of string around, That is a reference I do not get... -- Lgb

1.2.0 - 1.3.0 include pulldown

2002-10-31 Thread Rod Pinna
In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the text as verbatim, even though in 122, the doc was saved with the included text as included. It seems to format OK for latex though. Rod _ rod | Beneath the

1.2.0 -> 1.3.0 "include" pulldown

2002-10-31 Thread Rod Pinna
In the qt version of 130, the pulldown list for included text shows the text as "verbatim", even though in 122, the doc was saved with the included text as "included". It seems to format OK for latex though. Rod _ rod | "Beneath