1.4.0 Source Code bug under Solaris x86

2006-03-16 Thread Markus Mayer
Hi, I just built and packaged LyX 1.4.0 for the Blastwave project. I found that the following error occurs (x86 only, not SPARC): /opt/csw/gcc3/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -Winvalid-pch --include=./pch.h -I./.. -I../../boost -I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/openwin/include

Re: 1.4.0 Source Code bug under Solaris x86

2006-03-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Markus Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi, | | I just built and packaged LyX 1.4.0 for the Blastwave project. I found | that the following error occurs (x86 only, not SPARC): | [...] | | This is problem is very similar to the issue I reported on Oct. 26, | 2005. It's even the same file

Re: 1.4.0 Source Code bug under Solaris x86

2006-03-16 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:15:54PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | I just built and packaged LyX 1.4.0 for the Blastwave project. I found | that the following error occurs (x86 only, not SPARC): | [...] | | This is problem is very similar to the issue I reported on Oct. 26, | 2005.

1.4.0 Source Code bug under Solaris x86

2006-03-16 Thread Markus Mayer
Hi, I just built and packaged LyX 1.4.0 for the Blastwave project. I found that the following error occurs (x86 only, not SPARC): /opt/csw/gcc3/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -Winvalid-pch --include=./pch.h -I./.. -I../../boost -I/opt/csw/include -I/usr/openwin/include

Re: 1.4.0 Source Code bug under Solaris x86

2006-03-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Markus Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, | | I just built and packaged LyX 1.4.0 for the Blastwave project. I found | that the following error occurs (x86 only, not SPARC): | [...] | | This is problem is very similar to the issue I reported on Oct. 26, | 2005. It's even the same file

Re: 1.4.0 Source Code bug under Solaris x86

2006-03-16 Thread John Levon
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 10:15:54PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | I just built and packaged LyX 1.4.0 for the Blastwave project. I found > | that the following error occurs (x86 only, not SPARC): > | > [...] > | > | This is problem is very similar to the issue I reported on Oct. 26, > |