Le 28/04/2016 17:05, Richard Heck a écrit :
The tar.gz goes from 31.9 to 25.4. The tar.xz goes from 20.1 to 14.6.
Not bad :) Richard, interested for 2.1.5?
Yes, sure.
Done.
JMarc
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> The tar.gz goes from 31.9 to 25.4. The tar.xz goes from 20.1 to 14.6.
Nice! P
On 04/28/2016 07:14 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 27/04/2016 22:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>> Ran the tests and everything looks good.
>>
>> The tar.gz goes from 31.9 to 25.4. The tar.xz goes from 20.1 to 14.6.
>
> Not bad :) Richard, interested for 2.1.5?
Yes, sure.
rh
Le 28/04/2016 15:09, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I think it is mostly known, as documented here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=20160412181702.GA20336%40OptiPlex-9020.ad.ufl.edu
Indeed, I missed it.
The remaining differences are:
- We updated the version of boost, which caused us
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 01:14:33PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 27/04/2016 22:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > Ran the tests and everything looks good.
> >
> > The tar.gz goes from 31.9 to 25.4. The tar.xz goes from 20.1 to 14.6.
>
> Not bad :) Richard, interested for 2.1.5?
>
> AFAI
Le 27/04/2016 22:18, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Ran the tests and everything looks good.
The tar.gz goes from 31.9 to 25.4. The tar.xz goes from 20.1 to 14.6.
Not bad :) Richard, interested for 2.1.5?
AFAIU, the reason for having a 2.2.0 tarball larger than the 2.1.4 one
is still unknown.
J
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:56:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 27/04/2016 04:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > I propose that I apply the patch and that you do your usual testing to
> > > check
> > > that everything is OK from your side.
> >
> > Sounds good, go ahead.
>
> Done.
Ra
Le 27/04/2016 04:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
I propose that I apply the patch and that you do your usual testing to check
that everything is OK from your side.
Sounds good, go ahead.
Done.
JMarc
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:57:28AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 26/04/2016 01:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > Actually, my patch was not correct, this is the one that is needed for
> > > building correctly.
> > >
> > > Concerning the risk, as long as it builds, it is OK.
> > >
> >
Le 26/04/2016 01:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Actually, my patch was not correct, this is the one that is needed for
building correctly.
Concerning the risk, as long as it builds, it is OK.
However, I do not think that Resources.cpp appreared in 2.2.0rc1 (I do not
have it here to check). I did
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:27:03PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 19/04/2016 23:46, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > > Normally I probably wouldn't want to change something at this point, but
> > > > on 2.2.0rc1 that file takes up 24MB in the extracted tar ball so it
> > > > would be nice t
Le 19/04/2016 23:46, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Normally I probably wouldn't want to change something at this point, but
on 2.2.0rc1 that file takes up 24MB in the extracted tar ball so it
would be nice to get rid of it.
Is this a +1 for 2.2.0?
Yes. Since you are confident, I think decreasing
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:58:42AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/04/2016 21:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:48:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 15/04/16 21:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Jean-
Le 15/04/2016 21:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:48:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/04/16 21:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 13/04/2016 21:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
It is ind
Am Samstag, 16. April 2016 um 01:40:26, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 15.04.2016 um 09:22 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> >>> You are right, spellcheck-continously.svgz should be removed from
> >>> the git
> >>> repo.
> >>
> >> Please go ahead.
> >
> > Done.
>
> But this breaks for me the compilatio
Am 15.04.2016 um 09:22 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
You are right, spellcheck-continously.svgz should be removed from
the git
repo.
Please go ahead.
Done.
But this breaks for me the compilation with MSVC 2010 and Qt 5.5.1:
Generating moc_GuiApplication.cpp
Generating ui_CitationUi.h
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 09:48:38PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/04/16 21:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>Le 13/04/2016 21:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >>>It is indeed in SOURCEFILES, and it had been the
Le 15/04/16 21:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 13/04/2016 21:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
It is indeed in SOURCEFILES, and it had been there all the time. I guess
it should be removed, but with care.
Do you build befo
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:19:20PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 13/04/2016 21:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> >It is indeed in SOURCEFILES, and it had been there all the time. I guess
> >it should be removed, but with care.
> >
> >Do you build before doing "make dist"?
>
> I'd say
Le 13/04/2016 21:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
It is indeed in SOURCEFILES, and it had been there all the time. I guess
it should be removed, but with care.
Do you build before doing "make dist"?
I'd say that this patch is all we need.
JMarc
>From 6c3c0cf94d114e3c483e49e694ed913d367ea
Le 15/04/2016 09:17, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 06:13:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 14/04/2016 01:50, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
This one is in the tar ball here.
I use the tar.xz tarball and there is only a file
spelling-continously.svgz
but not
spellcheck-contin
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 06:13:05PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 14/04/2016 01:50, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
> > > This one is in the tar ball here.
> >
> > I use the tar.xz tarball and there is only a file
> > spelling-continously.svgz
> > but not
> > spellcheck-continously.svgz
>
> You are
Le 14/04/2016 01:50, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
This one is in the tar ball here.
I use the tar.xz tarball and there is only a file
spelling-continously.svgz
but not
spellcheck-continously.svgz
You are right, spellcheck-continously.svgz should be removed from the
git repo.
JMarc
Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 um 20:36:47, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 um 01:20:56, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> >
> > > Am 13.04.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > >
> > > > Could you check where the files c
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 um 10:04:02, schrieb Kornel Benko
> > > Sorry. I meant, there is a file
> > > lyx.svg
> > > in Git master and also in the tarball but after the compilation there is
> > > only a
> > > lyx.png
> > > in the resulting folder ~\LYX_INSTALLED\Resources\images
> >
> > Sho
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 um 09:58:15, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 um 01:50:44, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
>
> > Am 13.04.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> >
> > >> I noticed that we have the files
> > >> - lyx.svgz
> > >
> > > I cannot find this in our git tree.
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2016 um 01:50:44, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 13.04.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
> >> I noticed that we have the files
> >> - lyx.svgz
> >
> > I cannot find this in our git tree.
>
> Sorry. I meant, there is a file
> lyx.svg
> in Git master and also in the ta
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:26:13AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 um 01:20:56, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> > Am 13.04.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> >
> > > Could you check where the files comes from?
> >
> > Hi Kornel,
> >
> > It is the attached file. It is already in
Am 13.04.2016 um 11:15 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
I noticed that we have the files
- lyx.svgz
I cannot find this in our git tree.
Sorry. I meant, there is a file
lyx.svg
in Git master and also in the tarball but after the compilation there is
only a
lyx.png
in the resulting folder ~\LYX
Le 13/04/16 20:07, Richard Heck a écrit :
Richard, I am not sure where this one came from. but your should
double check next time.
The Makefile for src/frontend/qt4 has:
am__liblyxqt4_a_SOURCES_DIST = ButtonPolicy.cpp ButtonPolicy.h \
Dialog.cpp Dialog.h Resources.cpp Action.cpp B
On 04/13/2016 05:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 13/04/2016 11:23, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
It compiles fine on gentoo x86.
BTW why is tarball 2x bigger than for 2.1?
Pavel
>>>
>>> Why 2X bigger? I see a change from 20.8 to 32 from LyX 2.1.4 to
>>> 2.2.
On 2016-04-13, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> The recent gcc exploded with memory consumption while compiling lyx,
> I can't compile monolithic build on 2GB RAM machine anymore.
I had this problem long ago (with 1GM) and since then always compile without
debugging symbols:
* `../lyx/configure --enable-bui
Le 13/04/2016 11:23, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
It compiles fine on gentoo x86.
BTW why is tarball 2x bigger than for 2.1?
Pavel
Why 2X bigger? I see a change from 20.8 to 32 from LyX 2.1.4 to 2.2.0rc1.
lyx-2.1.4.tar.xz10673 KB
lyx-2.2.0rc1.tar.xz 19669 KB
It
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I don't know much about this, but it seems to me to be a compiler issue.
>> Your compiler wants to track variables and it reached a limit regarding
>> an internal (with respect to the compiler) limit.
>>
>> Hopefully someone who knows more about this can confirm that
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > It compiles fine on gentoo x86.
> > BTW why is tarball 2x bigger than for 2.1?
> > Pavel
>
> Why 2X bigger? I see a change from 20.8 to 32 from LyX 2.1.4 to 2.2.0rc1.
lyx-2.1.4.tar.xz10673 KB
lyx-2.2.0rc1.tar.xz 19669 KB
> Here are some possible reasons:
Le 12/04/2016 23:52, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
The tar balls and sig files are here:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
I noticed that we have the files
- lyx.svgz
I cannot find this in our git tree.
- spellcheck-continously.svg
Le 13/04/2016 08:29, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
$ insets/InsetListingsParams.cpp: In constructor
‘lyx::{anonymous}::ParValidator::ParValidator()’:
insets/InsetListingsParams.cpp:298:1: note: variable tracking size limit
exceeded with -fvar-tracking-assignments, retrying without
ParValidator::ParVa
Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 um 01:20:56, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 13.04.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>
> > Could you check where the files comes from?
>
> Hi Kornel,
>
> It is the attached file. It is already in the tarball in the folder
> ~\lib\examples
>
> I see now that it is also in
> ~\l
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 08:32:05AM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
> >
> > The tar balls and sig files are here:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
> >
> > Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
> >
> > Non-packagers, ple
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 01:27:00AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> >Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> I built and tested the tarball with Qt 5.6. Here is the resulting installer:
> http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0RC-1/
Thanks,
Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> The tar balls and sig files are here:
>
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
>
> Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
>
> Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball)
> and basic functionality
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:35:47PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 12/04/2016 02:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >The tar balls and sig files are here:
> >
> >ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
> >
> >Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
> >
> >Non-packagers, please do
Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
Hi Scott,
I built and tested the tarball with Qt 5.6. Here is the resulting installer:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0RC-1/
I won't have time to release a Qt 5.5.1 build right now (need some sleep
and won
Am 13.04.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Kornel Benko:
Could you check where the files comes from?
Hi Kornel,
It is the attached file. It is already in the tarball in the folder
~\lib\examples
I see now that it is also in
~\lib\examples
in Git master. Therefore it is in the tarball. I nevertheless won
Am Dienstag, 12. April 2016 um 23:52:04, schrieb Uwe Stöhr
> Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > The tar balls and sig files are here:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
>
> I noticed that we have the files
> - lyx.svgz
> - spellcheck-continously.svgz
Am 12.04.2016 um 03:58 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
The tar balls and sig files are here:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
I noticed that we have the files
- lyx.svgz
- spellcheck-continously.svgz
in our Git tree but not in the tarball. Is this correct?
Another issue: In the
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:02:58AM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball)
> > and basic functionality on your platform, and let us know how it goes.
>
> It compiles fine on gentoo x86.
> BTW why is tarball 2x
Le 12/04/2016 02:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
The tar balls and sig files are here:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball)
and basic functionality on your platform,
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball)
> and basic functionality on your platform, and let us know how it goes.
It compiles fine on gentoo x86.
BTW why is tarball 2x bigger than for 2.1?
Pavel
The tar balls and sig files are here:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.2/lyx-2.2.0rc1
Packagers, please prepare your binaries.
Non-packagers, please do a quick test of compilation (from the tar ball)
and basic functionality on your platform, and let us know how it goes.
Thank you all for y
50 matches
Mail list logo
