Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Yokota K. yoko...@gmail.com writes: Looking at my current situations, I feel like my current pace (i.e. to post from time to time) is the most I can do at this moment. So, I think I'd better ask you for the right when not having it becomes an obstacle... Thank you so much for the offer. I'm

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Yokota K." writes: > Looking at my current situations, I feel like my current pace (i.e. to > post from time to time) is the most I can do at this moment. So, I > think I'd better ask you for the right when not having it becomes an > obstacle... > > Thank you so much for the

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-16 Thread Yokota K.
Looking at my current situations, I feel like my current pace (i.e. to post from time to time) is the most I can do at this moment. So, I think I'd better ask you for the right when not having it becomes an obstacle... Thank you so much for the offer. I'm going to continue posting as before.

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-16 Thread Yokota K.
Looking at my current situations, I feel like my current pace (i.e. to post from time to time) is the most I can do at this moment. So, I think I'd better ask you for the right when not having it becomes an obstacle... Thank you so much for the offer. I'm going to continue posting as before.

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-14 Thread Christian Ridderström
Yokota K. wrote: Thank you! It's honorable for me, but I feel like my contributions need to be checked by someone else. I think it'd be safer that I continue posting staying at current status ;) if its just question of safety its pretty normal that before committing anything you post if for

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-14 Thread Christian Ridderström
Yokota K. wrote: Thank you! It's honorable for me, but I feel like my contributions need to be checked by someone else. I think it'd be safer that I continue posting staying at current status ;) if its just question of safety its pretty normal that before committing anything you post if for

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-08 Thread Yokota K.
Thank you! It's honorable for me, but I feel like my contributions need to be checked by someone else. I think it'd be safer that I continue posting staying at current status ;) Thanks and regards, Koji

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
Yokota K. wrote: Thank you! It's honorable for me, but I feel like my contributions need to be checked by someone else. I think it'd be safer that I continue posting staying at current status ;) if its just question of safety its pretty normal that before committing anything you post if for

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-08 Thread Yokota K.
Thank you! It's honorable for me, but I feel like my contributions need to be checked by someone else. I think it'd be safer that I continue posting staying at current status ;) Thanks and regards, Koji

Re: Access for Koji? (Re: r31865 - in lyx-devel/trunk: development/scons lib lib/doc lib/doc/ja lib/layouts lib/templates)

2009-11-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
Yokota K. wrote: > Thank you! It's honorable for me, but I feel like my contributions > need to be checked by someone else. I think it'd be safer that I > continue posting staying at current status ;) if its just question of safety its pretty normal that before committing anything you post if for