Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars mentioned something about applying it to his local tree. Wouldn't hurt
| to beat him to it!
I think it is in... or did I forget to commit?
Lgb
On Tuesday 28 November 2000 13:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars mentioned something about applying it to his local tree. Wouldn't
| hurt to beat him to it!
I think it is in... or did I forget to commit?
Yep, you forgot!
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars mentioned something about applying it to his local tree. Wouldn't hurt
| to beat him to it!
I think it is in... or did I forget to commit?
Lgb
On Tuesday 28 November 2000 13:02, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Lars mentioned something about applying it to his local tree. Wouldn't
> | hurt to beat him to it!
>
> I think it is in... or did I forget to commit?
Yep, you forgot!
"Angus" == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Fixed by the following one line patch. This should be applied
Angus to both 1.1.5fix2 and to current CVS.
I applied it to 1.1.5fixcvs. Has it been applied to the main branch? I
am a bit lost on what patches are still pending.
JMarc
Lars mentioned something about applying it to his local tree. Wouldn't hurt
to beat him to it!
Angus
On Monday 27 November 2000 11:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Angus" == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Fixed by the following one line patch. This should be applied
Angus
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Fixed by the following one line patch. This should be applied
Angus> to both 1.1.5fix2 and to current CVS.
I applied it to 1.1.5fixcvs. Has it been applied to the main branch? I
am a bit lost on what patches are still pending.
Lars mentioned something about applying it to his local tree. Wouldn't hurt
to beat him to it!
Angus
On Monday 27 November 2000 11:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> Fixed by the following one line patch. This should be
On Wednesday 22 November 2000 18:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
Still working on my lengthy list of changes to UserGuide (for 1.1.5fix2).
The font size changing shortcuts don't seem to be working, e.g. M-s t for
tiny-font. Apparently, some message is being written to the lyx-buffer,
Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 22 November 2000 18:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi again,
|
| Still working on my lengthy list of changes to UserGuide (for 1.1.5fix2).
| The font size changing shortcuts don't seem to be working, e.g. M-s t for
| tiny-font.
On Wednesday 22 November 2000 18:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Still working on my lengthy list of changes to UserGuide (for 1.1.5fix2).
> The font size changing shortcuts don't seem to be working, e.g. M-s t for
> tiny-font. Apparently, some message is being written to the
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 22 November 2000 18:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > Hi again,
| >
| > Still working on my lengthy list of changes to UserGuide (for 1.1.5fix2).
| > The font size changing shortcuts don't seem to be working, e.g. M-s t for
| > tiny-font.
Hi again,
Still working on my lengthy list of changes to UserGuide (for 1.1.5fix2).
The font size changing shortcuts don't seem to be working, e.g. M-s t for
tiny-font. Apparently, some message is being written to the lyx-buffer,
but it is immediately overwritten by "Font: Default", so that I
Hi again,
Still working on my lengthy list of changes to UserGuide (for 1.1.5fix2).
The font size changing shortcuts don't seem to be working, e.g. M-s t for
tiny-font. Apparently, some message is being written to the lyx-buffer,
but it is immediately overwritten by "Font: Default", so that I
14 matches
Mail list logo
