Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-07 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 01:05:26PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote: > I will use that if someone can instruct me how to use vim as the > editor for msvs. :-) Works rather well. Use vim for the editing tasks and the IDE for debugging. Andre'

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-07 Thread Georg Baum
Bo Peng wrote: > Lars, would you please write a few words regarding these autotools > features so that we can work towards them? IIRC the release procedure is decsribed somehwere on the wiki. Georg

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > I don't know autotools very good, so could you please describe a | > little bit was one can do with this "distribution feature"? | > Thanks, | | We rarely use these features. They are used for packaging and | distributing lyx, which are primarily Lar's jo

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-06 Thread Bo Peng
I don't know autotools very good, so could you please describe a little bit was one can do with this "distribution feature"? Thanks, We rarely use these features. They are used for packaging and distributing lyx, which are primarily Lar's job. For me, I only used 'rpmbuild -ba lyx-xxx.tar.gz' to

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-06 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I think good pch support is only in gcc > 4.1. define 'good'. No based on personal experience but on some articles I've read in the past. I don't really know... pch support has worked in gcc at least since 3.4. G

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-06 Thread Peter Kümmel
Bo Peng wrote: > Hi,, all, > > I heard no bug report etc concerning scons/msvs_project so I assume it > is done (or will not be used at all). Anyone still interested in the > pch feature? This is the only big feature that is missing in the scons > system, but I am not sure how much we can benefit

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Indeed. At that time, I will propose a build system competition | between autotools, scons and cmake (if it will go in as well) and try | to replace autotools. Tests. Distribution creation and testing. Out-of-the-box buildsystem on most unix systems that h

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-05 Thread Bo Peng
> I heard no bug report etc concerning scons/msvs_project so I assume it > is done (or will not be used at all). Sorry Bo. I didn't have the time to check it but I will use it for sure. There is a resize window bug with MSVC; did you solve that Peter? I will use that if someone can instruct me

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I think good pch support is only in gcc > 4.1. define 'good'. pch support has worked in gcc at least since 3.4. -- Lgb

Re: Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-05 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Bo Peng wrote: Hi,, all, I heard no bug report etc concerning scons/msvs_project so I assume it is done (or will not be used at all). Sorry Bo. I didn't have the time to check it but I will use it for sure. There is a resize window bug with MSVC; did you solve that Peter? Anyone still inte

Anyone wants scons/pch?

2006-06-05 Thread Bo Peng
Hi,, all, I heard no bug report etc concerning scons/msvs_project so I assume it is done (or will not be used at all). Anyone still interested in the pch feature? This is the only big feature that is missing in the scons system, but I am not sure how much we can benefit from it. The facts that pc