On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 22:14 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > On the other hand I was concerned with encoding a text message in
> > integer number that in Python is infinite precision:
>
> You lost me here.
>
> JMarc
That is a way to pass a a light message (season's greetings) into a
Le 04/12/2022 à 22:13, José Matos a écrit :
On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 21:12 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I finally managed to convinced python to like me, and pushed the
result.
JMarc
Nice, I intended to look into this issue this weekend.
Let's say I believe you ;)
On the other hand I
On Sun, 2022-12-04 at 21:12 +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I finally managed to convinced python to like me, and pushed the
> result.
>
> JMarc
Nice, I intended to look into this issue this weekend.
On the other hand I was concerned with encoding a text message in
integer number that in
On Sun, Dec 04, 2022 at 09:12:45PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 02/12/2022 à 18:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > Just as a reminder, the goal is to have char-delete-backwards without
> > > argument actually delete previous element, without consideration of
> > > confirmation that are
Le 02/12/2022 à 18:11, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Just as a reminder, the goal is to have char-delete-backwards without
argument actually delete previous element, without consideration of
confirmation that are only relevant to interactive use.
Sorry, I have no experience with this.
Once
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 05:40:44PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 21/02/2022 à 15:10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
> > Le 21/02/2022 à 03:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 07:20:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > > I really wonder why this special
Le 21/02/2022 à 15:10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 21/02/2022 à 03:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 07:20:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I really wonder why this special behavior is by default, since it is
only
useful for interactive edition.
I would
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 03:10:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 21/02/2022 à 03:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 07:20:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > I really wonder why this special behavior is by default, since it is only
> > > useful for
Le 21/02/2022 à 03:27, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 07:20:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I really wonder why this special behavior is by default, since it is only
useful for interactive edition.
I would prefer to have
char-delete-forward confirm
bound to the
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 07:20:24PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Le 18/02/2022 à 17:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > To reproduce, open the User Guide (make sure it is editable, i.e., not
> > read only). Then run the following command sequence:
> >
> > command-sequence inset-forall
Le 18/02/2022 à 17:12, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
To reproduce, open the User Guide (make sure it is editable, i.e., not
read only). Then run the following command sequence:
command-sequence inset-forall Caption char-delete-forward; statistics; undo
I get the following assertion:
Fixed in
To reproduce, open the User Guide (make sure it is editable, i.e., not
read only). Then run the following command sequence:
command-sequence inset-forall Caption char-delete-forward; statistics; undo
I get the following assertion:
CursorSlice.cpp (222): can't compare cursor and anchor in
12 matches
Mail list logo
