On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:03:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:03:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:49:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Why have the at all then?
Feel free to remove it.
IMHO we should ditch VERIFIED and only use CLOSE, seems a lot more
natural to me.
Er, why ? CLOSED means not much.
| This is what VERIFIED means - the bug is fixed, and
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:49:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
Why have the at all then?
| Feel free to remove it.
IMHO we should ditch VERIFIED and only use CLOSE, seems a lot more
natural to me.
| Er, why ? CLOSED means not much.
It mean
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:41:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:03:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:49:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:03:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
It mean CLOSED, finito - finished - not open at all.
Lars, that's a chimera - there's no such thing. A bug may regess at any
pont.
| It's already closed.
Or is it just verified to be fixed?
Which is exactly what it
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Please do not use CLOSED at alll, it makes searches harder.
So what is 'closed' good for?
Absolu tely nothing, except hiding information
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
It mean CLOSED, finito - finished - not open at all.
| Lars, that's a chimera - there's no such thing. A bug may regess at any
| pont.
I do disagree with you.
| It's already
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
It mean CLOSED, finito - finished - not open at all.
| Lars, that's a chimera - there's no such thing. A bug may regess at any
| pont.
So we shoudn't close bugs becasue they can
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:55:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| Lars, that's a chimera - there's no such thing. A bug may regess at any
| pont.
I do disagree with you.
Is this because my drunk spelling is abysmal ?
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:03:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
> Status|VERIFIED
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:03:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
>>
>>What|Removed |Added
>>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:49:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Why have the at all then?
Feel free to remove it.
> IMHO we should ditch VERIFIED and only use CLOSE, seems a lot more
> natural to me.
Er, why ? "CLOSED" means not much.
> | This is what "VERIFIED" means - the bug is
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:49:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> Why have the at all then?
>
| Feel free to remove it.
>
>> IMHO we should ditch VERIFIED and only use CLOSE, seems a lot more
>> natural to me.
>
| Er, why ? "CLOSED" means not much.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:41:27PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:03:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
> >
> >What|Removed |Added
> >
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 05:49:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 02:03:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
> >>
> >>What|Removed
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> It mean "CLOSED", finito - finished - not open at all.
Lars, that's a chimera - there's no such thing. A bug may regess at any
pont.
> | It's already closed.
>
> Or is it just verified to be fixed?
Which is exactly what
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Please do not use CLOSED at alll, it makes searches harder.
>
> So what is 'closed' good for?
Absolu tely nothing, except hiding information
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> It mean "CLOSED", finito - finished - not open at all.
>
| Lars, that's a chimera - there's no such thing. A bug may regess at any
| pont.
I do disagree with you.
>
>> | It's
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:39:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> It mean "CLOSED", finito - finished - not open at all.
>
| Lars, that's a chimera - there's no such thing. A bug may regess at any
| pont.
So we shoudn't close bugs becasue they
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:55:54AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Lars, that's a chimera - there's no such thing. A bug may regess at any
> | pont.
>
> I do disagree with you.
Is this because my drunk spelling is abysmal ?
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the
After saving and loading a file with latex code:
LyX: Unknown language `ignore' [around line 80 of file
~/Dissertation/PhD/speclangs.lyx]
Should be simple to fix, shouldn't it?
Michael
--
==
Michael Schmitt
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote:
After saving and loading a file with latex code:
LyX: Unknown language `ignore' [around line 80 of file
~/Dissertation/PhD/speclangs.lyx]
Should be simple to fix, shouldn't it?
BTW: If you save the file again. These \lang ignore statements are
On 26-Jul-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote:
After saving and loading a file with latex code:
LyX: Unknown language `ignore' [around line 80 of file
~/Dissertation/PhD/speclangs.lyx]
Should be simple to fix, shouldn't it?
Well not really but I'm quite there!
Jürgen
--
After saving and loading a file with latex code:
LyX: Unknown language `ignore' [around line 80 of file
~/Dissertation/PhD/speclangs.lyx]
Should be simple to fix, shouldn't it?
Michael
--
==
Michael Schmitt
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> After saving and loading a file with latex code:
>
> LyX: Unknown language `ignore' [around line 80 of file
> ~/Dissertation/PhD/speclangs.lyx]
>
> Should be simple to fix, shouldn't it?
BTW: If you save the file again. These "\lang ignore"
On 26-Jul-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote:
> After saving and loading a file with latex code:
>
> LyX: Unknown language `ignore' [around line 80 of file
> ~/Dissertation/PhD/speclangs.lyx]
>
> Should be simple to fix, shouldn't it?
Well not really but I'm quite there!
Jürgen
--
28 matches
Mail list logo
