On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
We have some of these...
I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
never be fixed.
IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
bug is fixed (1.4.0 for most of them I
Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| We have some of these...
|
| I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
| never be fixed.
|
| IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
We have some of these...
I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
never be fixed.
IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
bug is fixed (1.4.0
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Martin Vermeer wrote:
|
| On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| We have some of these...
|
| I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
| never be fixed.
|
| IMHO the target should be changed
Am Samstag, 4. März 2006 23:20 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
We have some of these...
I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
never be fixed.
IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
bug is fixed (1.4.0 for most of them I guess) and
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Am Samstag, 4. März 2006 23:20 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
|
| We have some of these...
|
| I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
| never be fixed.
|
| IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars I don't agree. The bug is fixed. So it should be resolved as
Lars fixed and the target set to the version where it was fixed.
Yes.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars I don't agree. The bug is fixed. So it should be resolved as
| Lars fixed and the target set to the version where it was fixed.
|
| Yes.
the relyx bugs on the other hand... those we
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:42:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars I don't agree. The bug is fixed. So it should be resolved as
| Lars fixed and the target set to the version
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:42:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| | Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| |
| | Lars I don't agree. The bug is fixed. So it should be
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> We have some of these...
>
> I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
> never be fixed.
>
> IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
> bug is fixed (1.4.0 for most of
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > We have some of these...
| >
| > I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
| > never be fixed.
| >
| > IMHO the target should be changed to the
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
We have some of these...
I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
never be fixed.
IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
bug is fixed (1.4.0
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Martin Vermeer wrote:
|
| >On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 11:20:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| >>We have some of these...
| >>
| >>I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
| >>never be fixed.
| >>
| >>IMHO the target
Am Samstag, 4. März 2006 23:20 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>
> We have some of these...
>
> I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
> never be fixed.
>
> IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
> bug is fixed (1.4.0 for most of them I
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Am Samstag, 4. März 2006 23:20 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
| >
| > We have some of these...
| >
| > I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
| > never be fixed.
| >
| > IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I don't agree. The bug is fixed. So it should be resolved as
Lars> fixed and the target set to the version where it was fixed.
Yes.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I don't agree. The bug is fixed. So it should be resolved as
| Lars> fixed and the target set to the version where it was fixed.
|
| Yes.
the relyx bugs on the other
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:42:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Lars> I don't agree. The bug is fixed. So it should be resolved as
> | Lars> fixed and the target
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 10:42:51PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | Lars> I don't agree. The bug is fixed. So
We have some of these...
I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
never be fixed.
IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
bug is fixed (1.4.0 for most of them I guess) and resolved as fixed.
Perhaps with a note that it will not be fixed for
On Saturday 04 March 2006 22:20, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
We have some of these...
I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
never be fixed.
If they are fixed in 1.4.x then they are really fixed. Or you let some of
them to me for my ultra-stable series. ;-)
I
We have some of these...
I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
never be fixed.
IMHO the target should be changed to the earliest version where the
bug is fixed (1.4.0 for most of them I guess) and resolved as fixed.
Perhaps with a note that it will not be fixed for
On Saturday 04 March 2006 22:20, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We have some of these...
>
> I guess that since 1.4.0 is released very soon now, these bugs will
> never be fixed.
If they are fixed in 1.4.x then they are really fixed. Or you let some of
them to me for my ultra-stable series. ;-)
24 matches
Mail list logo