Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:30:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Note that if CJK-LyX takes use the fact that wchar_t is 32 bit on | linux, then it won't work on windows sine wchar_t is only 16 bit there. | | -- | Lgb | | Since

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:30:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | Note that if CJK-LyX takes use the fact that wchar_t is 32 bit on | | linux, then it won't work on windows sine wchar_t is only

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:30:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | >>Note that if CJK-LyX takes use the fact that wchar_t is 32 bit on > | >>linux, then it won't work on windows sine wchar_t is only 16 bit there. > | >> > | >>-- > | >>

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:30:41PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | >>Note that if CJK-LyX takes use the fact that wchar_t is 32 bit on | > | >>linux, then it won't work on windows sine

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Note that if CJK-LyX takes use the fact that wchar_t is 32 bit on | linux, then it won't work on windows sine wchar_t is only 16 bit there. | | -- | Lgb | | Since qt handles wchar_t well in Linux, why not in Windows? Then qt uses whar_t as

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>Note that if CJK-LyX takes use the fact that wchar_t is 32 bit on | >>linux, then it won't work on windows sine wchar_t is only 16 bit there. | >> | >>-- | >>Lgb | | Since qt handles wchar_t well in Linux, why not in Windows? Then qt

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - From: Wang Xiangqi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2006-04-08 21:25:00 Subject: Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2) Windows version can be compiled for users' convienience? Thanks I do not use Windows in my daily work, and I don't

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | - Original Message - | From: Wang Xiangqi [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Date: 2006-04-08 21:25:00 | Subject: Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2) | | Windows version can be compiled for users' convienience

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Note that if CJK-LyX takes use the fact that wchar_t is 32 bit on linux, then it won't work on windows sine wchar_t is only 16 bit there. -- Lgb Since qt handles wchar_t well in Linux, why not in Windows? Regards, cghan

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message - >> From: "Wang Xiangqi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Date: 2006-04-08 21:25:00 >> Subject: Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2) >> >> Windows version can be compile

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-08 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | - Original Message - | >> From: "Wang Xiangqi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | >> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | >> Date: 2006-04-08 21:25:00 | >> Subject:

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Note that if CJK-LyX takes use the fact that wchar_t is 32 bit on >>linux, then it won't work on windows sine wchar_t is only 16 bit there. >> >>-- >>Lgb Since qt handles wchar_t well in Linux, why not in Windows? Regards, cghan

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0

2006-04-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
cghan == [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cghan Hello, Hello, cghan I have just uploaded CJK-LyX-qt-1.4.0 at the usual ftp site, cghan ftp://cellular.phys.pusan.ac.kr/CJK-LyX/qt . cghan I have tested the patch for some time without any problem, but cghan it's always possible there may be some

CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-07 Thread cghan
Hello, I've just found a small but annoying bug and fixed it. So, anyone who downloaded CJK-LyX-qt-1.4.0-1, should upgraded to the release 2 version at the same ftp site, ftp://cellular.phys.pusan.ac.kr/CJK-LyX/qt . Sorry for any inconveniences this may cause. Regards, cghan

Re: CJK-LyX-1.4.0

2006-04-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "cghan" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cghan> Hello, Hello, cghan> I have just uploaded CJK-LyX-qt-1.4.0 at the usual ftp site, cghan> ftp://cellular.phys.pusan.ac.kr/CJK-LyX/qt . cghan> I have tested the patch for some time without any problem, but cghan> it's always possible there

CJK-LyX-1.4.0 (release-2)

2006-04-07 Thread cghan
Hello, I've just found a small but annoying bug and fixed it. So, anyone who downloaded CJK-LyX-qt-1.4.0-1, should upgraded to the "release 2" version at the same ftp site, ftp://cellular.phys.pusan.ac.kr/CJK-LyX/qt . Sorry for any inconveniences this may cause. Regards, cghan

CJK-LyX-1.4.0

2006-04-06 Thread cghan
Hello, I have just uploaded CJK-LyX-qt-1.4.0 at the usual ftp site, ftp://cellular.phys.pusan.ac.kr/CJK-LyX/qt . I have tested the patch for some time without any problem, but it's always possible there may be some serious bugs. Also notice that I have dropped the xform-frontend for this

CJK-LyX-1.4.0

2006-04-06 Thread cghan
Hello, I have just uploaded CJK-LyX-qt-1.4.0 at the usual ftp site, ftp://cellular.phys.pusan.ac.kr/CJK-LyX/qt . I have tested the patch for some time without any problem, but it's always possible there may be some serious bugs. Also notice that I have dropped the xform-frontend for this