On 10/08/2017 02:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 02:56:32PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 10/07/2017 09:30 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:39:37PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
On 10/07/2017 06:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 02:56:32PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/07/2017 09:30 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:39:37PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
> >> On 10/07/2017 06:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 02:16:39PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
>
On 10/07/2017 09:30 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:39:37PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 10/07/2017 06:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 02:16:39PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
>>>
Probably more for master, as there is a simpler solution for
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:39:37PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/07/2017 06:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 02:16:39PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
> >
> >> Probably more for master, as there is a simpler solution for 2.3.x. But
> >> it would be good
> >> to test it.
>
On 10/07/2017 06:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 02:16:39PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Probably more for master, as there is a simpler solution for 2.3.x. But
>> it would be good
>> to test it.
> Do you have a patch for the simpler solution that I can test for 2.3.x?
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 02:16:39PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
> Probably more for master, as there is a simpler solution for 2.3.x. But
> it would be good
> to test it.
Do you have a patch for the simpler solution that I can test for 2.3.x?
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 10/07/2017 12:51 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:08:28PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 10/03/2017 05:28 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2017 03:54 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 03/10/17 à 21:43, Richard Heck a écrit :
> The crucial thing here
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:08:28PM +, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 05:28 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 10/03/2017 03:54 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Le 03/10/17 à 21:43, Richard Heck a écrit :
> >>
> >>> The crucial thing here seems to be that it's a "menu" inset. That
> >>>
On 10/03/2017 05:28 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 10/03/2017 03:54 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 03/10/17 à 21:43, Richard Heck a écrit :
>>
>>> The crucial thing here seems to be that it's a "menu" inset. That
>>> triggers a menu search, which calls getStatus, which ends up accessing
>>>
On 10/03/2017 03:54 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 03/10/17 à 21:43, Richard Heck a écrit :
>
>> The crucial thing here seems to be that it's a "menu" inset. That
>> triggers a menu search, which calls getStatus, which ends up accessing
>> the Cursor, which is now out of date. So we end up
Le 03/10/17 à 21:43, Richard Heck a écrit :
The crucial thing here seems to be that it's a "menu" inset. That
triggers a menu search, which calls getStatus, which ends up accessing
the Cursor, which is now out of date. So we end up here:
A different solution would be to avoid calling
On 10/03/2017 03:10 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Can anyone else reproduce?
>
> 1. Open Additional.lyx in LyX
> 2. Go to a URL inset (e.g. search for "www.literateprogramming.com")
> 3. Highlight the inside of the inset (e.g. ctrl-a).
> 4. Change that URL externally (e.g. add a letter somewhere)
>
Am 03.10.2017 um 21:10 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> Can anyone else reproduce?
>
> 1. Open Additional.lyx in LyX
> 2. Go to a URL inset (e.g. search for "www.literateprogramming.com")
> 3. Highlight the inside of the inset (e.g. ctrl-a).
> 4. Change that URL externally (e.g.
Can anyone else reproduce?
1. Open Additional.lyx in LyX
2. Go to a URL inset (e.g. search for "www.literateprogramming.com")
3. Highlight the inside of the inset (e.g. ctrl-a).
4. Change that URL externally (e.g. add a letter somewhere)
5. Click "Reload" in LyX's blue banner notification.
6.
14 matches
Mail list logo