Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-29 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 09:08:12PM +0200, ben wrote: > > > > > > Probably it will never be implemented. ;-) > > No problem for me, longtable is enough. Come on, I was stating that I would never implement long tables. ;-) > > I have commited the code that fix this. > > I have also commit

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-25 Thread ben
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos a écrit : > On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:44:26PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 08:04:28PM +0200, ben wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Hi Ben, I think this discussion is better suited for the lyx-devel so I > > have move it to here. > [...]

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 24-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > I have called the Table Examples from examples and got 2 error when I > tried to display it. Could you have a look? There is a problem with the compatibility read for minipages. The closing } of the {\centering tag around the minipage is insi

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 24-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > My point is to make the users' live easier. Imagine that I like to put the > footers in the end of the table, the preamble in the begin and the table > body in the middle. Even although we have to export the code in a different > order than

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 02:21:04PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: [...] > > I know I'm too good sometimes ;) That's too kind of you. ;-) > > You could provide more visual feedback for header and footer, say with > > bold fonts. Those are the visual expectations we have related to both of > > t

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 24-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > I read the longtable.dvi that comes with tetex, if that is what you mean. >:-) I have it open for more than 24 hours to iluminate me with your design. > ;-) But now I got it from your explanation. :-) I know I'm too good sometimes ;) > Ok,

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:56:44AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > Well you have to know how LaTeX work to be able to understand this :) We want also, as long as possible, spare the user to the latex details. And in this case that is very easy. I read the longtable.dvi that comes with tetex

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Juergen Vigna
>> With the actual tabular code you can have as much as you want! > > How? > endhead, endfirsthead, endlastfoot and endfoot are just integers. Well you have to know how LaTeX work to be able to understand this :) Anyway the number is only the row under which I write the f.ex.: \endfoot comm

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:09:18AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 23-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > > > While in the docbook model you can have how many head rows and foot rows > > you want to. > > Same in LaTeX! Ok. > > My solution as to enable both (if present) first

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 23-Oct-2001 Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > While in the docbook model you can have how many head rows and foot rows > you want to. Same in LaTeX! > My solution as to enable both (if present) firsthead and head rows to be > present in the header, by this order, and foot and last foo

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-24 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 04:44:26PM +0100, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 08:04:28PM +0200, ben wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Ben, I think this discussion is better suited for the lyx-devel so I > have move it to here. [...] > > What do you think ? > > Probably it will ne

Re: DocBook: Table head (wish)

2001-10-23 Thread Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 08:04:28PM +0200, ben wrote: > Hi, Hi Ben, I think this discussion is better suited for the lyx-devel so I have move it to here. > I would like that when a table is created the SGML output can contain a > , especially when long tables are used. I have done that. The