Hello,
Would it be possible, for Windows users, to have tex2lyx documentation
in html form in addition to Unix man form? As far as I know, there is no
user-friendly man viewer for Windows (except Emacs)? I suppose the
source of the doc is in texinfo, so html output could be generated
automati
Lavaud Michel writes:
> Hello,
>
> Would it be possible, for Windows users, to have tex2lyx documentation
> in html form in addition to Unix man form? As far as I know, there is
> no user-friendly man viewer for Windows (except Emacs)? I suppose the
> source of the doc is in texinfo, so html outp
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lavaud Michel writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Would it be possible, for Windows users, to have tex2lyx documentation
> > in html form in addition to Unix man form? As far as I know, there is
> > no user-friendly man viewer for W
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 07:56:00PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Lavaud Michel writes:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Would it be possible, for Windows users, to have tex2lyx documentation
> > > in html form in addition t
On 2009-05-27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Lavaud Michel writes:
>> Would it be possible, for Windows users, to have tex2lyx documentation
>> in html form in addition to Unix man form?
> This is a very good point. In the old days, the man page was produced
> from a lyx document, but this is
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Lavaud Michel writes:
Hello,
Would it be possible, for Windows users, to have tex2lyx documentation
in html form in addition to Unix man form? As far as I know, there is
no user-friendly
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Hmm... I can swear I attached it. Trying again but compressed this time
> (maybe there's a filter that strips html attachments).
I cannot open the file. But I agree a html version should be added.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
>> Hmm... I can swear I attached it. Trying again but compressed this time
>> (maybe there's a filter that strips html attachments).
>
> I cannot open the file. But I agree a html version should be added.
A lyx version would be much better.
jmarc wrote:
> somebody would have to
> rewrite the man pages (but the man pages would become much
> more readable).
also note that bugzilla.lyx.org is mentionned a couple of times...
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:51:37AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > Hmm... I can swear I attached it. Trying again but compressed this time
> > (maybe there's a filter that strips html attachments).
>
> I cannot open the file.
It must be uncompressed by "gunzip t
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:02:26AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
>
> > Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm... I can swear I attached it. Trying again but compressed this time
> >> (maybe there's a filter that strips html attachments).
> >
> > I cannot open th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> A lyx version would be much better...
Maybe. However, we still should be able to produce a man page and actually
ship man pages. I don't know if there is any good troff2latex converter,
though.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
A lyx version would be much better...
Maybe. However, we still should be able to produce a man page and actually
ship man pages. I don't know if there is any good troff2latex converter,
though.
A reStructuredText backend wou
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> A reStructuredText backend would solve many problems.
And surely introduce many others. If the only problem is shipping an
html version of the man pages the most unintrusive and fool proof
way is using man2html. With
man2html /pa
Enrico Forestieri writes:
> And surely introduce many others. If the only problem is shipping an
> html version of the man pages the most unintrusive and fool proof
> way is using man2html.
The question is precisely to know whether we want to ship an html page.
Our documentation is in LyX format
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri writes:
> > And surely introduce many others. If the only problem is shipping an
> > html version of the man pages the most unintrusive and fool proof
> > way is using man2html.
>
> The question is precisel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Enrico Forestieri writes:
And surely introduce many others. If the only problem is shipping an
html version of the man pages the most unintrusive and fool proof
way is using man2html.
The question is precisely to know whether we want to ship an html pag
17 matches
Mail list logo
