Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Please commit.
Done at dc38ae873a8b.
Georg
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Andrew Parsloe wrote:
>
> > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10074. This is a regression since they
> > display correctly as two hyphens in 2.1.4 in all cases (default,
> > emphasis, bolding, colour).
>
> Thank you very much for reportin
Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10074. This is a regression since they
> display correctly as two hyphens in 2.1.4 in all cases (default,
> emphasis, bolding, colour).
Thank you very much for reporting this. I did indeed make a mistake when I
removed the special meaning of
On 15/04/2016 7:11 a.m., Georg Baum wrote:
Andrew Parsloe wrote:
Double hyphens in LyX-Code are now not merged to an en dash in rc1,
either in LyX or the pdf. Good. But if the font is changed, they become
an en dash in the pdf -- even something as simple as emphasis or bolding
has this effect.
Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> Double hyphens in LyX-Code are now not merged to an en dash in rc1,
> either in LyX or the pdf. Good. But if the font is changed, they become
> an en dash in the pdf -- even something as simple as emphasis or bolding
> has this effect. Is this expected behaviour? (I was hop
Double hyphens in LyX-Code are now not merged to an en dash in rc1,
either in LyX or the pdf. Good. But if the font is changed, they become
an en dash in the pdf -- even something as simple as emphasis or bolding
has this effect. Is this expected behaviour? (I was hoping the
separateness of the
