"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > portable to OS/2 PM. How do you estimate Abiword toolkit (abi/src/af/)?
>
> I don't know the Abiword toolkit. Do you have a link?
Please look at "af" directory of Abiword source. It contains an
abstraction
of the event handling, the fo
> I prefer Windows native to MFC, since Windows native code is fairly easily
> portable to OS/2 PM. How do you estimate Abiword toolkit (abi/src/af/)?
I don't know the Abiword toolkit. Do you have a link?
Greets,
Asger
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only true options I have seen for Win32 toolkits are Windows native
> (in C), the Microsoft Foundation Classes which are a relatively thin layer
> on top of the Windows widgets (in C++), Qt, which has an emulation mode
> which is pretty
Uwe> Another point is
Uwe> cross-platform availability for both Linux/Unix and Win32.
Just a quick remark on this: The support is there, so that FLTK
applications *wrok* on Win32, but they are not nice Win32 applications.
They do not behave like other applications on Win32, and I find that
subop
> "Uwe" == Uwe Walschus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Hello, I'm not a developer and so it's easy for me to give the
Uwe> following advice: How about switching the GUI toolkit which LyX
Uwe> is build on from XForms to FLTK ? FLTK (http://www.fltk.org) is
Uwe> LGPL-ed, and even more, it pro
Hello,
I'm not a developer and so it's easy for me to give the following
advice:
How about switching the GUI toolkit which LyX is build on from XForms to
FLTK ? FLTK (http://www.fltk.org) is LGPL-ed, and even more, it provides
some kind of XForms- compatibility through a alternative xforms.h (but
