On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Allan Rae wrote:
> Still tripping down memory lane...
>
> Suggested/rejected GUII implementation number two. Both of the above
> cases just end up being yet another restrictive cross-platform toolkit.
> We don't need that. If you want one of those then just create a port to
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Suggested/rejected GUII implementation number two. Both of the above
> > cases just end up being yet another restrictive cross-platform toolkit.
> > We don't need that. If you want one of those then just create a port to
> > the cross-platform toolki
> Suggested/rejected GUII implementation number two. Both of the above
> cases just end up being yet another restrictive cross-platform toolkit.
> We don't need that. If you want one of those then just create a port to
> the cross-platform toolkit of your choice and use that.
Oh, I did not sugge
Wow a trip down memory lane...
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Kalle> What could be done would be something like this:
> >
> > #ifdef XFORMS
> > typedef FL_OBJECT* WidgetPtr;
> > #elif defined QT
> > typedef QWidget* WidgetPtr;
> > #endif
>
> This should get encapsul
On Thursday 29 March 2001 14:28, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> It seems to me that having 5 implementations in one file separated by
> #ifndef's is not a good idea. I'd rather see 5 different implementation
> files. Not only will the code be cleaner, but I also like the idea of
> having the xform code in
> Kalle> What could be done would be something like this:
>
> #ifdef XFORMS
> typedef FL_OBJECT* WidgetPtr;
> #elif defined QT
> typedef QWidget* WidgetPtr;
> #endif
This should get encapsulated in a real class, say "Widget", with different
implementaions for Qt, xforms, etc.
> K
It seems to me that having 5 implementations in one file separated by
#ifndef's is not a good idea. I'd rather see 5 different implementation
files. Not only will the code be cleaner, but I also like the idea of having
the xform code in the xform dir, the qt code in the qt dir, etc.
Although n
Kalle Dalheimer and I have been having a discussion about possible ways
forward with the GUI-I stuff. Thought you might be interested (and of course,
I'll be able to find this on the archive in future!)
Feel free to comment...
A
Angus> Incidentally, how do you find the new scheme?
Angus> Any
