Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-16 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ronny Buchmann wrote: Dekel Tsur wrote: On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:41:44PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote: i have two versions of gs installed (in 6.01 in /usr and 6.60cvs in /usr/local) i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-16 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ronny Buchmann wrote: > Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:41:44PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote: > > > i have two versions of gs installed (in 6.01 in /usr and 6.60cvs in > > > /usr/local) > > > i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-14 Thread Ronny Buchmann
Dekel Tsur wrote: On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:41:44PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote: i have two versions of gs installed (in 6.01 in /usr and 6.60cvs in /usr/local) i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect /usr/local/bin/gs is 6.60 and i want gs6.01 for inline

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-14 Thread Ronny Buchmann
Dekel Tsur wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:41:44PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote: > > i have two versions of gs installed (in 6.01 in /usr and 6.60cvs in > > /usr/local) > > i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect /usr/local/bin/gs is 6.60 and i want gs6.01 for

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-13 Thread Ronny Buchmann
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "John" == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John But *we* can't fix it. It's a gs bug, requiring a gs bugfix John release (6.51 ?) John So it is not a lyx bug ... OK, I missed that fact. It coudld maybe be documented in README, then (since ghostscript

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-13 Thread John Levon
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Ronny Buchmann wrote: i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect has the format for this setting changed? (with lyx 1.1.6cvs) ronny You haven't said what you expect ... what is the problem exactly ? Is it that the figures still don't get

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:41:44PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote: i have two versions of gs installed (in 6.01 in /usr and 6.60cvs in /usr/local) i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect has the format for this setting changed? (with lyx 1.1.6cvs) The ps_command

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-13 Thread Ronny Buchmann
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > John> But *we* can't fix it. It's a gs bug, requiring a gs bugfix > John> release (6.51 ?) > > John> So it is not a lyx bug ... > > OK, I missed that fact. It coudld maybe be documented in README, then

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-13 Thread John Levon
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Ronny Buchmann wrote: > i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect > has the format for this setting changed? > (with lyx 1.1.6cvs) > > ronny You haven't said what you expect ... what is the problem exactly ? Is it that the figures still don't

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-13 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 09:41:44PM +0100, Ronny Buchmann wrote: > i have two versions of gs installed (in 6.01 in /usr and 6.60cvs in > /usr/local) > i tried to set \ps_command in lyxrc, but that isnt working as i expect > has the format for this setting changed? > (with lyx 1.1.6cvs) The

Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-11 Thread John Levon
A couple of users reported that they couldn't get recent Ghostscript versions to work with LyX with displaying figures inline. It transpires this is a Ghostscript bug http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbugbug_id=124957group_id=1897 This bug appears to affect 6.22 upwards. Hopefully a

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"John" == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Lars, JMarc, there should be some comment describing this John problem somewhere, but I wasn't sure where. INSTALL ? It depends whether we plan to fix it before next release(s). What do you think? Otherwise, it should probably go in BUGS.lyx,

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-11 Thread John Levon
On 11 Dec 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "John" == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John Lars, JMarc, there should be some comment describing this John problem somewhere, but I wasn't sure where. INSTALL ? It depends whether we plan to fix it before next release(s). What do you

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"John" == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John But *we* can't fix it. It's a gs bug, requiring a gs bugfix John release (6.51 ?) John So it is not a lyx bug ... OK, I missed that fact. It coudld maybe be documented in README, then (since ghostscript is documented here). And in any other

Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-11 Thread John Levon
A couple of users reported that they couldn't get recent Ghostscript versions to work with LyX with displaying figures inline. It transpires this is a Ghostscript bug http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug_id=124957_id=1897 This bug appears to affect 6.22 upwards. Hopefully a bugfix

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Lars, JMarc, there should be some comment describing this John> problem somewhere, but I wasn't sure where. INSTALL ? It depends whether we plan to fix it before next release(s). What do you think? Otherwise, it should probably go in

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-11 Thread John Levon
On 11 Dec 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > John> Lars, JMarc, there should be some comment describing this > John> problem somewhere, but I wasn't sure where. INSTALL ? > > It depends whether we plan to fix it before next

Re: Ghostscript 6.50 and LyX

2000-12-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> But *we* can't fix it. It's a gs bug, requiring a gs bugfix John> release (6.51 ?) John> So it is not a lyx bug ... OK, I missed that fact. It coudld maybe be documented in README, then (since ghostscript is documented here). And in