Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 03:59:35PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 01:36:04PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[]
There was no crash here, I had the exception message box displayed and
the buffer closed.
How do you get a bac
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 03:59:35PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 01:36:04PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> []
>>> There was no crash here, I had the exception message box displayed and
>>> the buffer closed.
>> How do you get a backtrace
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 01:36:04PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[]
There was no crash here, I had the exception message box displayed and the
buffer closed.
How do you get a backtrace in this situation?
Well, I down need one, the message box tells me which inset i
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 01:36:04PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[]
There was no crash here, I had the exception message box displayed and the
buffer closed.
How do you get a backtrace in this situation?
I am on windows also, and it is hard this way. If the exce
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 01:36:04PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
[]
> There was no crash here, I had the exception message box displayed and the
> buffer closed.
How do you get a backtrace in this situation?
Andre'
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 12:45:37PM +0100, Bernhard Roider wrote:
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:16:50PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still
puzzled about something. The crash is probably a consequence o
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 12:45:37PM +0100, Bernhard Roider wrote:
> Andre Poenitz schrieb:
>> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:16:50PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>>> I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still
>>> puzzled about something. The crash is probably a consequence of my
>>> at
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:16:50PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still
puzzled about something. The crash is probably a consequence of my
attempt to work on Paragraph.cpp, but I'm not sure exactly
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:16:50PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still puzzled
about something. The crash is probably a consequence of my attempt to work
on Paragraph.cpp, but I'm not sure exactly what's happened. The ba
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:16:50PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>
> I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still puzzled
> about something. The crash is probably a consequence of my attempt to work
> on Paragraph.cpp, but I'm not sure exactly what's happened. The backtrace
> gives
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:16:50PM -0500, rgheck wrote:
>
> I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still puzzled
> about something. The crash is probably a consequence of my attempt to work
> on Paragraph.cpp, but I'm not sure exactly what's happened. The backtrace
> gives
Ignore all of this: I finally figured out what the problem was.
rh
One more clue: It's a docstring, basic_string, according ot gdb.
rh
rgheck wrote:
I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still
puzzled about something. The crash is probably a consequence of my
att
One more clue: It's a docstring, basic_string, according ot gdb.
rh
rgheck wrote:
I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still
puzzled about something. The crash is probably a consequence of my
attempt to work on Paragraph.cpp, but I'm not sure exactly what's
happened
I've fixed the crash reported by Bernhard at r23549. But I'm still
puzzled about something. The crash is probably a consequence of my
attempt to work on Paragraph.cpp, but I'm not sure exactly what's
happened. The backtrace gives me a crash in the Layout constructor, and
from there in basic_s
14 matches
Mail list logo