On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 06:55:27AM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2015-12-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I don't actually care if we make the change. I was just curious why
> > things are how they are.
>
> Currently, if you remove the content of a "section paragraph", the
> complete paragraph i
On 2015-12-01, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What is the use case ? It looks useless to me.
> It was an exam. The desired output was
> 1
> Here is a question.
> 2
> Her
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:54:37PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What is the use case ? It looks useless to me.
It was an exam. The desired output was
1
Here is a question.
2
Here is another question.
...
I don't actually care if we make the change. I was just curious why
things are
What is the use case ? It looks useless to me.
JMarc
Le 30 novembre 2015 14:24:37 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a
écrit :
>I just received a .tex file from a colleague and he uses \section{}.
>
>Is there a reason to not have KeepEmpty 1 for sections?
>
>Scott
I just received a .tex file from a colleague and he uses \section{}.
Is there a reason to not have KeepEmpty 1 for sections?
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
