LFUN_FONT_STATE

2003-04-06 Thread John Levon
Why is this here ? john

LFUN_FONT_STATE

2003-04-06 Thread John Levon
Why is this here ? john

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John The usual: what's the intended purpose ? Display current font setting in minibuffer. It is not bound currently, but I guess it may be useful as part of a command-sequence. Why does this annoy you? JMarc

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:20:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Why does this annoy you? Bloat? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andre On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:20:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre wrote: Why does this annoy you? Andre Bloat? It uses something like 10 lines of code, I would say. Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always display this

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always display this font-state, then I agree that the lfun will be unnecessary. But I think Lars likes to use lfuns as interface to some things inside lyx. I have no problems

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Why does this annoy you? Andre Bloat? Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always display this font-state, You got it. then I agree that the lfun will be unnecessary. But I think Lars likes to use lfuns

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> The usual: what's the intended purpose ? Display current font setting in minibuffer. It is not bound currently, but I guess it may be useful as part of a command-sequence. Why does this annoy you? JMarc

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:20:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Why does this annoy you? Bloat? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:20:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Andre> wrote: >> Why does this annoy you? Andre> Bloat? It uses something like 10 lines of code, I would say. Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always display this > font-state, then I agree that the lfun will be unnecessary. But I > think Lars likes to use lfuns as interface to some things inside lyx. I have no

Re: LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-17 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Why does this annoy you? > > Andre> Bloat? > Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always display this > font-state, You got it. > then I agree that the lfun will be unnecessary. But I > think Lars likes to

LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-16 Thread John Levon
The usual: what's the intended purpose ? john -- i am sorey I cant reads yuor emale because my emale box has filtar on it whitch says, NO EMALES FROM PEOAPAL UNDER IQ OF 1 - jeffk

LFUN_FONT_STATE

2002-07-16 Thread John Levon
The usual: what's the intended purpose ? john -- "i am sorey I cant reads yuor emale because my emale box has filtar on it whitch says, "NO EMALES FROM PEOAPAL UNDER IQ OF 1" - jeffk