Can't we get rid of the automatic X11 thing? I don't want it and I don't
need it to build LyX/Win using the mingw cross compiler.
i386-mingw32-g++ -g -O -W -Wall -mms-bitfields -Wl,-enable-stdcall-fixup
-Wl,-enable-auto-import -Wl,-enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc -Wl,-s
-Wl,--export-all-symbols -o lyx
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Can't we get rid of the automatic X11 thing? I don't want it
Angus> and I don't need it to build LyX/Win using the mingw cross
Angus> compiler.
configure --without-x. This is needed by qt/mac too; we may want to
try to make it the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Can't we get rid of the automatic X11 thing? I don't want it
> Angus> and I don't need it to build LyX/Win using the mingw cross
> Angus> compiler.
>
> configure --without-x.
Excellent! The switch works!
> This is needed by qt/mac too; we may want to
> try t
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Angus> Can't we get rid of the automatic X11 thing? I don't want it
>> Angus> and I don't need it to build LyX/Win using the mingw cross
>> Angus> compiler.
>>
>> configure --without-x.
>
> Excellent! The switch works!
>
>> This is needed by
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Just for information, the attached script allows me to build a
Angus> cross-compiled LyX/Win 1.3.x, although at the moment I mush use
Angus> the natively compiled qt3.dll if the executable is to actually
Angus> run. Still working on
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Just for information, the attached script allows me to build a
> Angus> cross-compiled LyX/Win 1.3.x, although at the moment I mush use
> Angus> the natively compiled qt3.dll if the executable is to actually
> Angus> run. Still working on that one.
>
> Two smal
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Isn't it enough to just define QTDIR?
Angus> But I'm not 'exporting' QTDIR, I'm passing it to the configure
Angus> script in a format it will understand and *store*. Thereafter,
Angus> I can run make at my leisure without worrying whet
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> Did you succeed with static linking?
>
> Angus> Nope. Haven't tried.
>
> Angus> Do I need to re-compile (witness the QT_DIR,
> Angus> __declspec(dllimport) discussion) or can I just redo the
> Angus> linking step? If the latter, what flags should I pass to the
> A
Angus Leeming wrote:
In a moment of clear thinking, I tried to force the linker to load the qt
libraries statically.
G.
Try two.
... back again. The bloody error dialog popped up again, warning me that it
couldn't find qt3.dll.
I have NO idea where the linker is getting info about qt3.dll
On Saturday 23 April 2005 16:55, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> >In a moment of clear thinking, I tried to force the linker to load
> > the qt libraries statically.
> >
> >G.
> >
> >Try two.
> >
> >... back again. The bloody error dialog popped up again, warning
> > me that
10 matches
Mail list logo
