On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 10:03:55PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> On Qt/FreeWin32, variable 'h' is set to -14, i.e. to a negative value,
> though it should be positive (ascent should alway be positive, right?)
Almost always. Of course one could imagine situations where a full glyph
(e.g. accent)
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Anyway, the problem seems to be related to font_metrics::ascent:
>
> case MENU_SEPARATOR:
> {
> // A triangle the width and height of an 'x'
> int w = font_metrics::width('x', font);
> int ox = font_metrics::width(' ', font) + int(x);
>
Hi all,
But all this code is commented out, isn't it?
You are right. My fault :-(
Actually the problem with this code is that it is unreadable.
Indeed!
Anyway, the problem seems to be related to font_metrics::ascent:
case MENU_SEPARATOR:
{
// A triangle the width and height of an 'x'
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I also looked at QPainter::drawPolyline(...) and I was a bit
Michael> astonished by its complexity. The X Window function looks
Michael> simple but the Windows port adds a lot of lines of codes. In
Michael> particular, the fol
> > Second issue: As you have already pointed out, the menu separator is
> > not
> > displayed correctly. The same is true for math formulas. For instance,
> > create some simple math formula and then select it: The selection
> > background is shown _below_ the formula! Seems like some offset is
>
> Here I start swapping. 512MB is just not enough :-(
Must be that 1024MB then
Ruurd
> > Second issue: As you have already pointed out, the menu separator is not
> > displayed correctly. The same is true for math formulas. For instance,
> > create some simple math formula and then select it: The selection
> > background is shown _below_ the formula! Seems like some offset is
> > co
Ruurd Reitsma wrote:
>> Congratulations. I bet it took a while. Here it takes me 24 minutes
>> just to link the thing.
> Linking with a static Qt lib takes 12 seconds here;-)
Here I start swapping. 512MB is just not enough :-(
--
Angus
> Congratulations. I bet it took a while. Here it takes me 24 minutes just
to
> link the thing.
>
Linking with a static Qt lib takes 12 seconds here;-)
Ruurd
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Angus,
>
> I finally (!) managed to compile LyX 1.3 with MinGW.
Congratulations. I bet it took a while. Here it takes me 24 minutes just to
link the thing.
> LyX 1.4 still does not compile - see my previous email.
Sure. I haven't even tried, alth
Hi Angus,
I finally (!) managed to compile LyX 1.3 with MinGW. LyX 1.4 still does not
compile - see my previous email.
The basic functions of LyX seem to work but the handling of paths is broken.
For instance, if you start LyX, it wants to create directory
"C//.lyx-1.3.6cvs" which,
11 matches
Mail list logo
