Re: LyX 2.2 + Qt 5.5.1 segmentation fault on Fedora 23

2015-12-05 Thread PhilipPirrip
On 11/30/2015 04:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > In my experience, that backtrace often means a runtime conflict where both > qt4 and qt5 are trying to load into the same process (usually crashes > quickly) > > -- Rex Yes, you're probably right. This is what I was doing: I'd first call, in an empty

Re: LyX 2.2 + Qt 5.5.1 segmentation fault on Fedora 23

2015-12-01 Thread Rex Dieter
Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 19.11.2015 um 04:00 schrieb PhilipPirrip : > >> I had a similar issue a month or so ago, what helped was a clean cloning >> of LyX source. Now even that doesn't work, and it's been like that for 2 >> or 3 weeks. It might be due to newest Qt libraries that came with Fedora

Re: LyX 2.2 + Qt 5.5.1 segmentation fault on Fedora 23

2015-11-19 Thread PhilipPirrip
On 11/19/2015 01:27 AM, Stephan Witt wrote: I've redirected it to developers list. Sorry, that was sent by mistake. The report I sent here has an updated gdb output - I installed all debug-infos. QPrinter is being mentioned several times. Thought we should still investigate, if it's Qt, you w

Re: LyX 2.2 + Qt 5.5.1 segmentation fault on Fedora 23

2015-11-18 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 19.11.2015 um 04:00 schrieb PhilipPirrip : > I had a similar issue a month or so ago, what helped was a clean cloning of > LyX source. Now even that doesn't work, and it's been like that for 2 or 3 > weeks. It might be due to newest Qt libraries that came with Fedora 23, not > sure. Can you

LyX 2.2 + Qt 5.5.1 segmentation fault on Fedora 23

2015-11-18 Thread PhilipPirrip
I had a similar issue a month or so ago, what helped was a clean cloning of LyX source. Now even that doesn't work, and it's been like that for 2 or 3 weeks. It might be due to newest Qt libraries that came with Fedora 23, not sure. Can you read anything from this backtrace? (...after insta