On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 02:41:03PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:48:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have modified GNU diff to be able to emulate `cvs diff`. This
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> I don't understand why the shell script you described required changing
> diffultils.
>
> Alternatively, if you're worrying about ignoring the right files, why not
> write a script that creates a file of files to ignore in the diff, and then
> call diff
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 02:41:03PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:48:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > >
> > > I have modified GNU diff to be able to emulate `cvs diff`. This allows
> > > anyone with two copies of a cvs snapshot
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Amir Karger wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:48:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> > I have modified GNU diff to be able to emulate `cvs diff`. This allows
> > anyone with two copies of a cvs snapshot to modify one and gener
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:48:42PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I have modified GNU diff to be able to emulate `cvs diff`. This allows
> anyone with two copies of a cvs snapshot to modify one and generate a
> diff between the two that is the equivalent
On 13 Sep 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 13-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
> | >
> | > But to do that would require me to have *two* source trees, because cvs
> | > won't know about the new files because I can't do "cvs add".
> |
> | Well I gu
