Le 20/12/2021 à 12:16, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Montag, dem 20.12.2021 um 10:21 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
Tried again and (once more) ended up at
commit 26ea1e14966c092a7b87c75c19b83a369e79aeb8
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Sun Apr 22 19:06:46 2018 +0200
Align
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 12:41:03PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:08:01 +0100
> schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> > Am Montag, dem 20.12.2021 um 11:19 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > > Same commit as originally found Scott :)
> >
> > Which is what the "once more" part
Am Mon, 20 Dec 2021 12:08:01 +0100
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Montag, dem 20.12.2021 um 11:19 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> > Same commit as originally found Scott :)
>
> Which is what the "once more" part referred to.
I missed it.
> > BTW, I am surprised by your time-values. Here the
Am Montag, dem 20.12.2021 um 10:21 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Tried again and (once more) ended up at
>
> commit 26ea1e14966c092a7b87c75c19b83a369e79aeb8
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Sun Apr 22 19:06:46 2018 +0200
>
> Align fontenc with document fonts
>
> I'll check if
Am Montag, dem 20.12.2021 um 11:19 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Same commit as originally found Scott :)
Which is what the "once more" part referred to.
> BTW, I am surprised by your time-values. Here the export took 1m 51
> secs before the last
> commit, and now I see 57 secs for the export to
Am Mon, 20 Dec 2021 10:21:35 +0100
schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 19:08 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > > I can bisect as well.
> >
> > I gave up.
>
> Tried again and (once more) ended up at
>
> commit 26ea1e14966c092a7b87c75c19b83a369e79aeb8
> Author:
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 19:08 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > I can bisect as well.
>
> I gave up.
Tried again and (once more) ended up at
commit 26ea1e14966c092a7b87c75c19b83a369e79aeb8
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Sun Apr 22 19:06:46 2018 +0200
Align fontenc with
Le 19/12/2021 à 15:45, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 15:03 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
So it's the cprotection checks that seem to cost time. Need to check
whether this can be optimized.
After 61b8afd893ec we're back at
real0m19,685s
user0m15,633s
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 19:21 + schrieb José Abílio Matos:
> If this proves to be a problem we can speed lyx2lyx code (using
> profiling to identify the bottlenecks).
No, this doesn't seem to be involved.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
On Sunday, 19 December 2021 17.15.19 WET Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> The first thing to check, since this is a 2.3.x file, is how much time
> is taken by lyx2lyx.
If this proves to be a problem we can speed lyx2lyx code (using profiling to
identify the bottlenecks).
--
José Abílio--
Le 19/12/2021 à 19:22, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 07:08:56PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 18:15 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
I can bisect as well.
I gave up.
I'll give it a try. Might not be able to do it until tomorrow though.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 07:08:56PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 18:15 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > I can bisect as well.
>
> I gave up.
I'll give it a try. Might not be able to do it until tomorrow though.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 18:15 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> I can bisect as well.
I gave up.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 11:55 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I can try to do another bisect if there's interest. I'm just not sure
> this is something even related to a use case. I guess the first thing
> to check would be if indeed the issue only shows up with a very long
> line.
The
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 05:39:16PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 11:37 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Thanks for checking. Indeed I think my computer has some performance
> > issues (especially with I/O, which I think is relevant in this case).
> >
> > And
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 11:37 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Thanks for checking. Indeed I think my computer has some performance
> issues (especially with I/O, which I think is relevant in this case).
>
> And what do you get with 2.3.0?
real0m1,108s
user0m1,077s
sys 0m0,031s
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 05:29:07PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 17:24 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > Though I am getting
> >
> > real0m5,935s
> > user0m5,739s
> > sys 0m0,066s
> >
> > With this on master (with -e pdflatex).
>
> (i.e.,
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 17:24 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Though I am getting
>
> real 0m5,935s
> user 0m5,739s
> sys 0m0,066s
>
> With this on master (with -e pdflatex).
(i.e., with your testfile)
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 11:10 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On master (with your recent fix), I get times like the following:
>
> real0m44.676s
> user0m44.575s
> sys 0m0.092s
>
> I'm still using the following command when testing:
>
> time mylyx 2.3.x -e
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 03:45:40PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 15:03 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> > So it's the cprotection checks that seem to cost time. Need to check
> > whether this can be optimized.
>
> After 61b8afd893ec we're back at
>
> real
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 15:03 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> So it's the cprotection checks that seem to cost time. Need to check
> whether this can be optimized.
After 61b8afd893ec we're back at
real0m19,685s
user0m15,633s
sys 0m3,025s
Which is still a bit slower than
Am Sonntag, dem 19.12.2021 um 11:45 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> I try to bisect myself.
This leads to:
commit b814c4fda732c8b5ee019692eb881c35b9335da6
Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
Date: Sun Sep 20 08:45:42 2020 +0200
Fix unnecessary cprotect
Note, however, that this is not
Am Samstag, dem 18.12.2021 um 13:26 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Thanks, Jean-Pierre. I wonder why you must export to pdf2. Using
> "pdflatex" instead gives an error?
Because -e takes a file format as argument, and the file format for
pdflatex output is pdf2, not pdflatex.
>
> In any case,
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 12:01:36PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 18/12/2021 à 03:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > If I do
> >
> >time lyx -e pdflatex UserGuide.lyx
> >
> > I get big differences in timings if I do the above with master versus
> > with 2.3.0. I'm not sure these
Le 18/12/2021 à 03:23, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
If I do
time lyx -e pdflatex UserGuide.lyx
I get big differences in timings if I do the above with master versus
with 2.3.0. I'm not sure these differences necessarily mean a
regression. I've definitely compiled master with different compile
If I do
time lyx -e pdflatex UserGuide.lyx
I get big differences in timings if I do the above with master versus
with 2.3.0. I'm not sure these differences necessarily mean a
regression. I've definitely compiled master with different compile
flags.
Does anyone else see differences when
26 matches
Mail list logo
