Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-24 Thread Andreas Neustifter
Hi, there is a pretty good instruction in development/cmake/README.cmake in the subversion tree. Altough it failed for me... I did a build exactly as in the README stated (tried both GNU make and Xcode) and both of them left me with an unusable binary (throwing some exception from boost

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-24 Thread Andreas Neustifter
Hi, there is a pretty good instruction in development/cmake/README.cmake in the subversion tree. Altough it failed for me... I did a build exactly as in the README stated (tried both GNU make and Xcode) and both of them left me with an unusable binary (throwing some exception from boost

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andreas == Andreas Neustifter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andreas Conclusion of my investigations: The Qt/Mac Binary Andreas Distribution installs all its libraries and includes in the Andreas framework style common to most Mac OS applications. All the Andreas necessary stuff is there, I created a

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Andreas Neustifter wrote: On 18.05.2007, at 18:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 22.05.2007, at 15:49, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Why don't you use the CMake support instead? As a bonus it will generate an XCode project for you... At least that's what I understood from Stefan and Peter exchange. Abdel. Sorry, there was another post from which I assumed that cmake is

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:44:07 pm Andreas Neustifter wrote: Sorry, there was another post from which I assumed that cmake is a   Microsoft/Windows thing. Big sorry for that, had to catch up on   latest build technology. With capital letters all the way it really looks like m$ stuff. ;-) [Yes,

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread Bob Lounsbury
On 5/22/07, Andreas Neustifter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 22.05.2007, at 15:49, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Why don't you use the CMake support instead? As a bonus it will generate an XCode project for you... At least that's what I understood from Stefan and Peter exchange. Abdel. Sorry,

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andreas" == Andreas Neustifter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andreas> Conclusion of my investigations: The Qt/Mac Binary Andreas> Distribution installs all its libraries and includes in the Andreas> framework style common to most Mac OS applications. All the Andreas> necessary stuff is

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Andreas Neustifter wrote: On 18.05.2007, at 18:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 22.05.2007, at 15:49, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Why don't you use the CMake support instead? As a bonus it will generate an XCode project for you... At least that's what I understood from Stefan and Peter exchange. Abdel. Sorry, there was another post from which I assumed that cmake is

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread José Matos
On Tuesday 22 May 2007 7:44:07 pm Andreas Neustifter wrote: > Sorry, there was another post from which I assumed that cmake is a   > Microsoft/Windows thing. Big sorry for that, had to catch up on   > latest build technology. With capital letters all the way it really looks like m$ stuff. ;-)

Re: Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-22 Thread Bob Lounsbury
On 5/22/07, Andreas Neustifter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 22.05.2007, at 15:49, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Why don't you use the CMake support instead? As a bonus it will > generate an XCode project for you... At least that's what I > understood from Stefan and Peter exchange. > > Abdel.

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-21 Thread Stefan Schimanski
FYI, the cmake build system supports the binary Qt already. Stefan On 20.05.2007, at 22:52, Andre Poenitz wrote: Next time please zip that. 170k is a bit too much to send to the list. Sorry, I tend to get sloppy with this DSL lines. A nice week to you all, Astifter PGP.sig

Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-21 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 18.05.2007, at 18:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for /path/to/Qt4 as referenced in the

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-21 Thread Stefan Schimanski
FYI, the cmake build system supports the binary Qt already. Stefan On 20.05.2007, at 22:52, Andre Poenitz wrote: Next time please zip that. 170k is a bit too much to send to the list. Sorry, I tend to get sloppy with this DSL lines. A nice week to you all, Astifter PGP.sig

Using Qt/Mac Binary Distribution for LyX make Was: Qt4 binary

2007-05-21 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 18.05.2007, at 18:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for "/path/to/Qt4" as referenced in the

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:25:56PM +0200, Andreas Neustifter wrote: But since it's not quite uninteresting for new users to install the binary Qt, here the list of files which are installed. Next time please zip that. 170k is a bit too much to send to the list. Andre'

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-20 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 20.05.2007, at 22:52, Andre Poenitz wrote: Next time please zip that. 170k is a bit too much to send to the list. Sorry, I tend to get sloppy with this DSL lines. A nice week to you all, Astifter

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:25:56PM +0200, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > But since it's not quite uninteresting for new users to install the > binary Qt, here the list of files which are installed. Next time please zip that. 170k is a bit too much to send to the list. Andre'

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-20 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 20.05.2007, at 22:52, Andre Poenitz wrote: Next time please zip that. 170k is a bit too much to send to the list. Sorry, I tend to get sloppy with this DSL lines. A nice week to you all, Astifter

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-19 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:35:27PM +0200, Andreas Neustifter wrote: On 18.05.2007, at 18:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-19 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:35:27PM +0200, Andreas Neustifter wrote: > > On 18.05.2007, at 18:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > >On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott > >Lambert wrote: > >>I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 > >>for the mac so > >>I wouldn't have to

Qt4 binary

2007-05-18 Thread Scott Lambert
I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for /path/to/Qt4 as referenced in the build instructions? Everything I've tried gives me a Qt library not found error. Do I need to compile Qt4 from

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-18 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for /path/to/Qt4 as referenced in the build instructions? Everything I've tried gives

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-18 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 18.05.2007, at 18:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for /path/to/Qt4 as referenced in the

Qt4 binary

2007-05-18 Thread Scott Lambert
I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for "/path/to/Qt4" as referenced in the build instructions? Everything I've tried gives me a "Qt library not found" error. Do I need to compile Qt4

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-18 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: > I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so > I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be > using for "/path/to/Qt4" as referenced in the build instructions? > Everything I've tried

Re: Qt4 binary

2007-05-18 Thread Andreas Neustifter
On 18.05.2007, at 18:38, Martin Vermeer wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:10:41AM -0600, Scott Lambert wrote: I downloaded and installed the binary version of Qt4 for the mac so I wouldn't have to compile it. Can anyone tell me what I should be using for "/path/to/Qt4" as referenced in the