On 15.05.2011 18:30, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 15.05.2011 10:03, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to:
- first discuss this with Richard and the CMake people,
- wait until the work in trunk has finished,
- wait until it is confirmed that everything works fine for all platform
Am 15.05.2011 18:30, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
But what do you mean with "differs (significantly) between versions 2.0.0 and
2.0.1"? I could never
compile LyX 2.0.0 from the 2_0_x branch using CMake, but only from trunk. But
trunk is now beyond
the point where the 2_0_x branch was created.
OK, I ma
> Nevertheless, I was able to compile LyX 1.6.x using CMake but not LyX
> 2.0.x. We should assure that every branch is at least compilable, despite
> the work on new features of the build systems.
>
Let's start then with the reason you can't compile LyX 2.0.x using CMake ?
(I've been too lazy to
Am 15.05.2011 10:03, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to:
- first discuss this with Richard and the CMake people,
- wait until the work in trunk has finished,
- wait until it is confirmed that everything works fine for all platforms,
- let the CMake people do the backpo
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Sat May 14 23:35:36 2011
> New Revision: 38758
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38758
>
> Log:
> backport CMake efforts to branch to be able to compile LyX 2.0.x the same way
> as trunk
Hi Uwe,
I've got some questions about this commit.
In general:
Wouldn'
