> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here
>> and there under unix (you did not test that, did you?), but I am in
>> the process of fixing them.
Ruurd> I must confess I didn't test them
I have commited ev
>OK, while applying the patch, I saw that there are no change logs!
>Ruurd, could you provide some asap? We need to document all the
here they are.
>changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and
>there under unix (you did not test that, did you?), but I am in the
>process
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> done.
OK, while applying the patch, I saw that there are no change logs!
Ruurd, could you provide some asap? We need to document all the
changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and
there under unix (you
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Ruurd> done.
|
| Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it?
No, no problems
--
Lgb
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> done.
Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it?
JMarc
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: maandag 14 mei 2001 14:43
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: LyX Developers; Claus Hentschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version
>
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in
Ruurd> the README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116
Ruurd> branch.
This looks good to me. I'd rather not apply it to 1.1.6, but it is IMO
OK for 1.2.0.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 09:15:01AM +0900, Miyata Shigeru wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers
> > to submit the final patch.
>
> Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and
> I can compile LyX again on OS/2.
I wrote:
> Since I cannot compile LyX any more here, I would like Windows developers
> to submit the final patch.
Thanks to a help from Ilya Zakharevich, I modified syscall() of EMX and
I can compile LyX again on OS/2. Well, almost.
In buffer.C, is included before "LString.h", which breaks the
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support
>
>
>Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments
>> than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like
&g
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me that at the time SMiyata submitted it more for comments
> than actual inclusion. Anyway, I think we really need something like
> that.
Yes, but one of the reason was that I cannot test the code on systems
other than OS/2.
> - pay
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| That would be great indeed.
|
| A few random comments about the patch (I do not know whether they are
| addressed to you of to SMiyata...):
|
| - the private variables should be named binname_, not _binname
|
| - pay attention to the case of f
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> after reading the raging debate over Win32 ports I decided to
Ruurd> take a look at the patches Claus Hentschel and I made. To my
Ruurd> surprise I found out that Miyata Shigeru had already wrapped up
Ruurd> my patch in a nice os
13 matches
Mail list logo
