> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here
>> and there under unix (you did not test that, did you?), but I am in
>> the process of fixing them.
Ruurd> I must confess I didn't test them
I have commited ev
>OK, while applying the patch, I saw that there are no change logs!
>Ruurd, could you provide some asap? We need to document all the
here they are.
>changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and
>there under unix (you did not test that, did you?), but I am in the
>process
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> done.
OK, while applying the patch, I saw that there are no change logs!
Ruurd, could you provide some asap? We need to document all the
changes that are done in the patch. There are other problems here and
there under unix (you
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Ruurd> done.
|
| Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it?
No, no problems
--
Lgb
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> done.
Lars, can I apply the patch, or do you have problems with it?
JMarc
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: maandag 14 mei 2001 14:43
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: LyX Developers; Claus Hentschel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] os class for OS/2 & Win32 support final version
>
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd A Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> Here's the final (?) version of my win32 patch. Details are in
Ruurd> the README.Win32. I've also attatched a patch for the 116
Ruurd> branch.
This looks good to me. I'd rather not apply it to 1.1.6, but it is IMO
OK for 1.2.0.
