Re: Bug in "Include file" dialog

2001-06-12 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 25 May 2001 13:30, Michael Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > could anybody please check whether the following bug is still present in > the latest cvs version? > > In the "Include file" dialog, the "OK" is not activated if you change > the file name by hand instead of opening the file browser.

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-30 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 30 May 2001, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 May 2001, John Levon wrote: > > > > > Everything else should be left for a while (say a couple of weeks) then added > > > to the bugtracker (For permanent record) and possibly a mail to the list as wel

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-30 Thread John Levon
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Allan Rae wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2001, John Levon wrote: > > > Everything else should be left for a while (say a couple of weeks) then added > > to the bugtracker (For permanent record) and possibly a mail to the list as well > > (I'm not sure all developers read the buglis

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-30 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 30-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > John> Everything else should be left for a while (say a couple of > John> weeks) then added to the bugtracker (For permanent record) and > John> possibly a mail to the list as well (I'm not sure all developers > John> read the buglist stuff) > > Well

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Everything else should be left for a while (say a couple of John> weeks) then added to the bugtracker (For permanent record) and John> possibly a mail to the list as well (I'm not sure all developers John> read the buglist stuff) Well

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-29 Thread Allan Rae
On Tue, 29 May 2001, John Levon wrote: > Everything else should be left for a while (say a couple of weeks) then added > to the bugtracker (For permanent record) and possibly a mail to the list as well > (I'm not sure all developers read the buglist stuff) I only have two arms, two legs, two eye

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-29 Thread John Levon
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote: > > PS: What is the best way of reporting bugs in lyx-devel right now (with > 1.2.0pre1 coming closer)? I wonder whether SourceForge is the right place > because I guess there are many small bugs in the cvs version but most of > them can be fixed very

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-28 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 28-May-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Juergen> IMO the best way would be a mail-list of small bugs sorted > Juergen> per module and send it updated to the list (so that people > Juergen> like myself are reminded that they hav

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> IMO the best way would be a mail-list of small bugs sorted Juergen> per module and send it updated to the list (so that people Juergen> like myself are reminded that they have something to do!) in Juergen> regular time periods.

RE: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-28 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 27-May-2001 Michael Schmitt wrote: > PS: What is the best way of reporting bugs in lyx-devel right now (with > 1.2.0pre1 coming closer)? I wonder whether SourceForge is the right place > because I guess there are many small bugs in the cvs version but most of > them can be fixed very quickly.

Re: Bug in "include file" dialog

2001-05-27 Thread Baruch Even
* Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010528 00:44]: > > PS: What is the best way of reporting bugs in lyx-devel right now (with > 1.2.0pre1 coming closer)? I wonder whether SourceForge is the right place > because I guess there are many small bugs in the cvs version but most of > them can be fi