"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | Did the quote binding get fixed? Where do I look to fix it myself?
| > |
| > | As I reported before, " produces " instead of `` and ''.
| >
| > I think I
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:35:08PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > |
> > | Did the quote binding get fixed? Where do I look to fix it myself?
> > |
> > | As I reported before, " produces " instead of `` and ''.
>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Did the quote binding get fixed? Where do I look to fix it myself?
> |
> | As I reported before, " produces " instead of `` and ''.
>
> I think I commited that. Howerver I too see "" but if I change to use
> «»
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:35:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On 24-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
| > |
| > | > So I really will just have to get used to this then. Guess emacs doesn'
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:35:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On 24-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> |
> | > So I really will just have to get used to this then. Guess emacs doesn't have
> | > insets, so it can bind Esc to anything it want
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 24-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
|
| > So I really will just have to get used to this then. Guess emacs doesn't have
| > insets, so it can bind Esc to anything it wants. M-x will just have to do.
| > Sigh
|
| Well we could bin ESC to a lyx-fu
> Well we could bin ESC to a lyx-func and then you can redefine it if you want!
> As it is now it is somehow hardcoded!
Sounds extremly sensible.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 24-May-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> So I really will just have to get used to this then. Guess emacs doesn't have
> insets, so it can bind Esc to anything it wants. M-x will just have to do.
> Sigh
Well we could bin ESC to a lyx-func and then you can redefine it if you want!
As it is no
On Thursday 24 May 2001 11:54, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 24-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > No, the Esc key also exits from insettext and insettabular (when you are
in
> > a table cell, pressing Esc will move the cursor into a "dummy" position
> > at the beginning of the cell, and pressing Esc
On 24-May-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> No, the Esc key also exits from insettext and insettabular (when you are in
> a table cell, pressing Esc will move the cursor into a "dummy" position
> at the beginning of the cell, and pressing Esc again will move the cursor
> out of the table.
Yes!
Generall
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:39:42AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 24 May 2001 11:24, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > On 24-May-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > I just noticed that it is impossible to use the minibuffer to input math
> > > lyxfuncs, since the cursor leaves the current math inset
On Thursday 24 May 2001 11:24, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 24-May-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I just noticed that it is impossible to use the minibuffer to input math
> > lyxfuncs, since the cursor leaves the current math inset as soon M-x is
> > hit.
>
> This is easy you have to handle the M-x l
On 24-May-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I just noticed that it is impossible to use the minibuffer to input math
> lyxfuncs, since the cursor leaves the current math inset as soon M-x is
> hit.
This is easy you have to handle the M-x lyx-func inside the LocalDispatch
funtion for formula.C so that
13 matches
Mail list logo
