RE: r32673 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

2009-12-31 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
Author: tommaso Date: Tue Dec 29 18:21:09 2009 New Revision: 32673 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32673 Log: Now, on C-S-f, only the findWA cursor remains visible and blinking, as it should be (formerly, the replaceWA cursor used to remain visible but non-blinking). Modified:

RE: r32673 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

2009-12-31 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
Author: tommaso Date: Tue Dec 29 18:21:09 2009 New Revision: 32673 URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32673 Log: Now, on C-S-f, only the findWA cursor remains visible and blinking, as it should be (formerly, the replaceWA cursor used to remain visible but non-blinking). I find it utterly

Re: r32673 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

2009-12-31 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: This lead me to find the correct fix for bug #6332 in r32687. So I propose to revert r32673 and to remove some extra lines. Is the attached patch ok with you ? yes, it's ok (no stale cursors), you can commit. T.

RE: r32673 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

2009-12-31 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>Author: tommaso >Date: Tue Dec 29 18:21:09 2009 >New Revision: 32673 >URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32673 > >Log: >Now, on C-S-f, only the findWA cursor remains visible and blinking, >as it should be (formerly, the replaceWA cursor used to remain >visible but non-blinking). >Modified:

RE: r32673 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

2009-12-31 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
>>Author: tommaso >>Date: Tue Dec 29 18:21:09 2009 >>New Revision: 32673 >>URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32673 >> >>Log: >>Now, on C-S-f, only the findWA cursor remains visible and blinking, as >>it should be (formerly, the replaceWA cursor used to remain visible but >>non-blinking).

Re: r32673 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4

2009-12-31 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote: This lead me to find the correct fix for bug #6332 in r32687. So I propose to revert r32673 and to remove some extra lines. Is the attached patch ok with you ? yes, it's ok (no stale cursors), you can commit. T.