Am Donnerstag, 21. Juni 2012 um 13:30:39, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn 
<v...@lyx.org>
> Op 21-6-2012 13:18, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
> > Am 15.06.2012 11:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> >
> >>   Sorry, there was a response, but it just didn't convince me.
> >
> > And that's why you reverted it. I still don't understand your concerns 
> > but OK, I'm tired of fighting. I updated it with the help of Peter, so 
> > 2 developers worked on getting the description up to date. I don't see 
> > why your opinion is stronger then the one of 2 others. If I remember 
> > correctly you mostly don't like Peter's add-on to CMake. But his 
> > version is exactly CMake plus two files extra.
> >
> > Uwe
> 
> I think I clearly explained by now why I don't like the change. I guess 
> my opinion is stronger, because I'm just sticking to the way it always 
> was, and not forcing my fellow developers to change to something that is 
> worse without any discussion and/or reasoning.
> 
> Concerning the 2 developers: 1 left us, the other one has no clue about 
> CMake.
> 
> Vincent

Hmm, I too prefer changes inside the cmake-own files rather than extra scripts 
valid
only for few users.

We _can_ of course provide also example scripts.

        Kornel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to